Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Oct;43(10):2255-60.
doi: 10.1023/a:1026618706464.

A randomized comparison of dilatation alone versus dilatation plus laser in patients receiving chemotherapy and external beam radiation for esophageal carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized comparison of dilatation alone versus dilatation plus laser in patients receiving chemotherapy and external beam radiation for esophageal carcinoma

B S Anand et al. Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Oct.

Abstract

Most patients with carcinoma of the esophagus have advanced disease at presentation. Since cure is usually not possible, the goal of treatment is the palliation of dysphagia. Palliative modalities include bougies, balloons, stents, tumor probe, laser, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. In recent years, combined chemotherapy and radiation has shown promising results. However, the relief of dysphagia is slow and frequently incomplete. We compared the effectiveness of dilatation alone versus dilatation plus Nd-YAG laser therapy for the relief of dysphagia while assessing the role of chemotherapy and radiation as an adjunct to surgery. Fifteen patients with squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus who were deemed fit for intensive chemotherapy and radiation were randomized to receive either dilatation alone (N = 7) or dilatation plus laser (N = 8); the end-point for initial success was the passage of a 45 French Savary dilator, and the relief of dysphagia. At entry, 13 of these 15 patients were judged potentially resectable. However, after chemotherapy and radiation, only 3 of 13 (20%) patients could be offered surgery; the remainder were considered too poor a surgical risk. Follow-up was for 30 months, or until death. Further dilatations were performed as needed for relief of dysphagia. No difference was observed between the laser plus dilatation and the dilatation alone group with respect to the degree of dysphagia, weight record, quality of life index (Karnofsky score), or mortality rate. Our results indicate that in patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation for esophageal carcinoma, dilatation alone provides adequate palliation of dysphagia, and in these patients, chemotherapy and radiation is a poor adjunct to surgical treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gut. 1987 Jul;28(7):792-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1986 Nov;121(11):1330-5 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1982 Jun;69(6):356-8 - PubMed
    1. Postgrad Med J. 1988 Nov;64(757):860-4 - PubMed
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1986 Sep;31(9 Suppl):57S-76S - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources