Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1191-4.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1191.

Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials: bibliographic study

C Sanders  1 , M Egger, J Donovan, D Tallon, S Frankel
Affiliations
Review

Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials: bibliographic study

C Sanders et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

  • BMJ 1998 Nov 14;317(7169):1353

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the frequency and quality of reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials.

Design: Search of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register 1980 to 1997 to identify trials from all disciplines, from oncology, and from cardiovascular medicine that reported on quality of life. Assessment of abstracts from articles published from 1993 to 1996. Assessment of a sample of full reports with a standardised instrument.

Main outcome measures: Prevalence of reporting on quality of life. Conditions and interventions studied in trials reporting on quality of life. Quality of reporting on quality of life.

Results: During 1980-97 reporting on quality of life increased from 0.63% to 4.2% for trials from all disciplines, from 1.5% to 8.2% for cancer trials, and from 0.34% to 3.6% for cardiovascular trials. Of 364 abstracts, 65% reported on drug interventions. Of a sample of 67 full reports, authors of 48 (72%) used 62 established quality of life instruments. In 15 reports (22%) authors developed their own measures, and in 2 (3%) methods were unclear. Response rates were given in 38 (57%), and complete reporting on all items and scales occurred in 31 (46%).

Conclusions: Less than 5% of all randomised controlled trials reported on quality of life, and this proportion was below 10% even for cancer trials. A plethora of instruments was used in different studies, and the reporting of methods and results was often inadequate. Standards for the measurement and reporting of quality of life in clinical trials research need to be developed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Prevalence of reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials identified from Cochrane Controlled Trials Register during 1980-97
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Patrick DL, Bergner M. Measurement of health status in the 1990s. Ann Rev Public Health. 1990;11:165–183. - PubMed
    1. Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA. 1994;272:619–626. - PubMed
    1. Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D. Issues in quality of life measurement in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:81–90S. - PubMed
    1. Fallowfield L. Quality of quality of life data. Lancet. 1996;348:421. - PubMed
    1. Naughton MJ, Shumaker SA. Assessment of health-related quality of life. In: Furberg CD, DeMets DL, editors. Fundamentals of clinical trials. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby Press; 1996.

Publication types

MeSH terms