Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1202-8.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1202.

Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team

A L Kinmonth et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of additional training of practice nurses and general practitioners in patient centred care on the lifestyle and psychological and physiological status of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Design: Pragmatic parallel group design, with randomisation between practice teams to routine care (comparison group) or routine care plus additional training (intervention group); analysis at one year, allowing for practice effects and stratifiers; self reporting by patients on communication with practitioners, satisfaction with treatment, style of care, and lifestyle.

Setting: 41 practices (21 in intervention group, 20 in comparison group) in a health region in southern England.

Subjects: 250/360 patients (aged 30-70 years) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and completing follow up at one year (142 in intervention group, 108 in comparison group).

Intervention: 1.5 days' group training for the doctors and nurses-introducing evidence for and skills of patient centred care and a patient held booklet encouraging questions.

Main outcome measures: Quality of life, wellbeing, haemoglobin A1c and lipid concentrations, blood pressure, body mass index (kg/m2).

Results: Compared with patients in the C group, those in the intervention group reported better communication with the doctors (odds ratio 2.8; 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 4.3) and greater treatment satisfaction (1.6; 1.1 to 2.5) and wellbeing (difference in means (d) 2.8; 0.4 to 5.2). However, their body mass index was significantly higher (d=2.0; 0.3 to 3.8), as were triglyceride concentrations (d=0.4 mmol/l; 0.07 to 0.73 mmol/l), whereas knowledge scores were lower (d=-2.74; -0.23 to -5.25). Differences in lifestyle and glycaemic control were not significant.

Conclusions: The findings suggest greater attention to the consultation process than to preventive care among trained practitioners; those committed to achieving the benefits of patient centred consulting should not lose the focus on disease management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design
Figure 2
Figure 2
Process: patients’ ratings of communication, satisfaction with treatment, style of care, and knowledge of perceived control of diabetes
Figure 4
Figure 4
Functional and psychological status
Figure 3
Figure 3
Clinical measures at one year

Comment in

References

    1. Katz J. The silent world of doctor and patient. New York: Free Press; 1984.
    1. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centred medicine: transforming the clinical method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
    1. Sullivan FM, MacNaughton RJM. Evidence in consultations: interpreted and individualised. Lancet. 1996;348:941–943. - PubMed
    1. Stewart M. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–1433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans BJ, Kiellerup FD, Standley RO, Burrows GD, Sweet B. A communication skills programme for increasing patient’s satisfaction with general practice consultations. Br J Med Psychol. 1987;60:373–378. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms