Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs
- PMID: 9796144
Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare side-by-side two different titanium screw-type implants in the maxillae of miniature pigs. The test implants had a machined and acid-etched surface (Osseotite) whereas the control implants were sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA). After 4, 8, and 12 weeks of healing, removal torque testing was performed to evaluate the shear strength of the bone-implant interface for both implant types. The results demonstrated significant differences between both implant types (P < .01). Osseotite implants revealed mean removal torque values (RTV) of 62.5 Ncm at 4 weeks, 87.6 Ncm at 8 weeks, and 95.7 Ncm at 12 weeks of healing. In contrast, the SLA implants demonstrated mean RTV of 109.6 Ncm, 196.7 Ncm, and 186.8 Ncm at corresponding healing periods. The mean RTV for SLA implants was 75% to 125% higher than for Osseotite implants up to 3 months of healing.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Oct;18(5):662-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01401.x. Epub 2007 Jun 30. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. PMID: 17608736
-
Bone response to unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula: an animal study in the Yorkshire pig.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Aug;32(4):383-9. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0367. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003. PMID: 14505621
-
Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02291.x. Epub 2011 Nov 14. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. PMID: 22092587
-
The reverse-torque test: a clinical report.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Mar-Apr;11(2):179-85. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996. PMID: 8666448 Review.
-
[The role of surface roughness in promoting osteointegration].Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2003 Jul;20(3):8-19, 98. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2003. PMID: 14515625 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
Numerical simulation of in vivo intraosseous torsional failure of a hollow-screw oral implant.Head Face Med. 2006 Nov 4;2:36. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-2-36. Head Face Med. 2006. PMID: 17083739 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation.J Adv Prosthodont. 2019 Dec;11(6):350-357. doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.350. Epub 2019 Dec 18. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019. PMID: 31897274 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on the osseointegration of dental implants: a biomechanics study.Clin Oral Investig. 2004 Dec;8(4):196-205. doi: 10.1007/s00784-004-0270-7. Epub 2004 Jul 29. Clin Oral Investig. 2004. PMID: 15583918
-
Nanofeatured surfaces in dental implants: contemporary insights and impending challenges.Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Jul 4;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00550-1. Int J Implant Dent. 2024. PMID: 38963524 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses.J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Mar;3(1):1-9. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.1.1. Epub 2011 Mar 31. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011. PMID: 21503186 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources