Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Jun;82(6):676-9.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.6.676.

Phenotypic heterogeneity may occur in congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles

Affiliations

Phenotypic heterogeneity may occur in congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles

A C Reck et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun.

Abstract

Background/aims: Congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (CFEOM) is an autosomal dominant, non-progressive disorder characterised by congenital ptosis and external ophthalmoplegia. CFEOM has previously been divided into several clinical entities; general fibrosis syndrome, strabismus fixus, vertical retraction syndrome, and congenital fibrosis of the inferior rectus. The purpose of this study was to identify families with CFEOM in this geographical region in order to perform a study of the clinical presentation of this disorder and to estimate its minimum prevalence in the population.

Methods: Four families were identified with CFEOM in the Wessex region from whom a full history with a pedigree was obtained. All individuals underwent ophthalmological examination.

Results/conclusion: This study shows that several of the CFEOM entities can be present within one family suggesting that these are variants of the same condition. It is suggested that subclassification is, therefore, not appropriate. The minimum prevalence of this disorder was found to be 1/230,000.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pedigrees of four families with congenital fibrosis of extraocular muscles, consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance, although there are no instances of male to male transmission.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Case 2.1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Case 2.2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Case 2.3.
None

References

    1. Ophthalmology. 1995 Apr;102(4):607-12 - PubMed
    1. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1955;53:245-50; discussion, 250-3 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1956 Mar;41(3):432-8 - PubMed
    1. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993 Dec;71(6):860-2 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1990 Jun;10(2):135-9 - PubMed