Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Oct;13(10):670-4.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00202.x.

Effect of evaluator and resident gender on the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation scores

V E Rand  1 , E S Hudes, W S Browner, R M Wachter, A L Avins
Affiliations

Effect of evaluator and resident gender on the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation scores

V E Rand et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of resident and attending physician gender on the evaluation of residents in an internal medicine training program.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Large urban academic internal medicine residency program.

Participants: During their first 2 years of training, 132 residents (85 men, 47 women) received a total of 974 evaluations from 255 attending physicians (203 men, 52 women) from 1989 to 1995.

Measurements: The primary measurements were the numerical portions of the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation form. Separate analyses were performed for each of the nine evaluation dimensions graded on a scale of 1 to 9. The primary outcome was the difference in the average scores received by each resident from male versus female attending physicians.

Results: Compared with female trainees, male residents received significantly higher scores from male attending physicians than from female attending physicians in six of the nine dimensions: clinical judgment, history, procedures, relationships, medical care, and overall. Similar trends, not reaching conventional levels of statistical significance, were observed in the other three categories: medical knowledge, physical exam, and attitude. These differences ranged from 0.24 to 0.60 points, and were primarily due to higher grading of male residents by male attending physicians than by female attending physicians.

Conclusions: In one academic training program, we found a significant interaction in the grading process between the gender of internal medicine residents and the gender of their attending evaluators. This study raises the possibility that subtle aspects of gender bias may exist in medical training programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gordon GH, Labby D, Levinson W. Sex and the teacher-learner relationship in medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:443–8. - PubMed
    1. Komaromy M, Bindman AB, Haber RJ, Sande MA. Sexual harassment in medical training. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:322–6. - PubMed
    1. Thompson WG, Lipkin M, Gilbert DA, Guzzo RA, Roberson L. Evaluating evaluation: assessment of the American Board of Internal Medicine Resident Evaluation Form. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:214–7. - PubMed
    1. Haber RJ, Avins AL. Do ratings on the American Board of Internal Medicine Resident Evaluation Form detect differences in clinical competence? J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:140–5. - PubMed
    1. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990;1:43–6. - PubMed