The intrauterine device and deaths from spontaneous abortion
- PMID: 980018
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197611182952102
The intrauterine device and deaths from spontaneous abortion
Abstract
To evaluate the intrauterine device as a risk factor for mortality associated with spontaneous abortion, we analyzed all deaths from spontaneous abortions reported in the period 1972-1974. Women dying from spontaneous abortions with a device in place were more likely to be young, white and married than those not wearing a device. Risk of death from spontaneous abortion was over 50 times greater for women who continued their pregnancy with a device in place than for those who did not. The Dalkon shield carried an increased risk of death, as compared to other devices, even after rates were adjusted for duration of use. However, pregnant women with either a loop or a coil in place also had a higher risk of dying from spontaneous abortion than those without any device. The results support the clinical recommendation that any device should be removed when pregnancy is first diagnosed.
PIP: Data on deaths from spontaneous abortion in the U.S. during 1972-1974 were analyzed to assess the IUD as a contributing factor. 50 deaths from spontaneous abortion were reported for the 3-year period, 17 of which were associated with an IUD in place during pregnancy. Those dying from spontaneous abortion with an IUD in place tended to be young, white, and married. The mortality risk from spontaneous abortion was more than 50 times as great in patients who continued their pregnancy with an IUD in place than those who did not. Compared with other devices, the Dalkon Shield IUD was associated with an increased risk of death from spontaneous abortion. The findings support the recommendation that an IUD be removed once pregnancy is confirmed.
Similar articles
-
Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems.Contraception. 1993 Jul;48(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90060-k. Contraception. 1993. PMID: 8403900 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcome of pregnancy in the presence of intrauterine device.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56(5):479-82. doi: 10.3109/00016347709155015. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977. PMID: 602718
-
Discontinued use of intrauterine contraceptive device and pregnancy loss.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Aug 1;149(7):768-71. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90119-4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984. PMID: 6465229
-
Fertility after contraception or abortion.Fertil Steril. 1990 Oct;54(4):559-73. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53808-4. Fertil Steril. 1990. PMID: 2209874 Review.
-
Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.Fertil Steril. 1992 Jun;57(6):1151-76. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55068-7. Fertil Steril. 1992. PMID: 1601137 Review.
Cited by
-
Long term use of inert intrauterine contraceptive devices in 94 women in Israel.Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Oct;42(363):423-5. Br J Gen Pract. 1992. PMID: 1466921 Free PMC article.
-
Pelvic inflammatory disease and the intrauterine device: findings in a large cohort study.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Mar 14;282(6267):855-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6267.855. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981. PMID: 6783202 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetric infections.West J Med. 1981 May;134(5):394-404. West J Med. 1981. PMID: 7020253 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contraceptive methods: risks and benefits.Br Med J. 1978 Sep 9;2(6139):721-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6139.721. Br Med J. 1978. PMID: 698695 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
LARC methods: entering a new age of contraception and reproductive health.Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Feb 23;1:4. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0011-8. eCollection 2016. Contracept Reprod Med. 2016. PMID: 29201394 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources