Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group
- PMID: 9802183
- DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b
Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group
Abstract
In observational studies, investigators have no control over the treatment assignment. The treated and non-treated (that is, control) groups may have large differences on their observed covariates, and these differences can lead to biased estimates of treatment effects. Even traditional covariance analysis adjustments may be inadequate to eliminate this bias. The propensity score, defined as the conditional probability of being treated given the covariates, can be used to balance the covariates in the two groups, and therefore reduce this bias. In order to estimate the propensity score, one must model the distribution of the treatment indicator variable given the observed covariates. Once estimated the propensity score can be used to reduce bias through matching, stratification (subclassification), regression adjustment, or some combination of all three. In this tutorial we discuss the uses of propensity score methods for bias reduction, give references to the literature and illustrate the uses through applied examples.
Similar articles
-
[Unbiased estimation of factorial effect by using analysis of covariance or propensity score method for observational studies in laboratory medicine].Rinsho Byori. 2012 Jul;60(7):689-97. Rinsho Byori. 2012. PMID: 22973732 Japanese.
-
Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.Nurs Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;57(6):444-52. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c66f6. Nurs Res. 2008. PMID: 19018219 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognostic models and the propensity score.Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb;24(1):183-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.1.183. Int J Epidemiol. 1995. PMID: 7797341
-
A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):734-53. doi: 10.1002/sim.2580. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 16708349
-
Invited commentary: propensity scores.Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Aug 15;150(4):327-33. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010011. Am J Epidemiol. 1999. PMID: 10453808 Review.
Cited by
-
Sulfonylurea Use in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and COPD: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;19(22):15013. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215013. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36429732 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of high-efficiency particulate air filtration on mortality among multiple myeloma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation.Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11789. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91135-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34083620 Free PMC article.
-
Delayed antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: individual patient data meta-analysis.BMJ. 2021 Apr 28;373:n808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n808. BMJ. 2021. PMID: 33910882 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Doulas in Improving Maternal Health and Health Equity Among Medicaid Enrollees, 2014‒2023.Am J Public Health. 2024 Nov;114(11):1275-1285. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307805. Am J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39356988 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term benefits of full-day kindergarten: a longitudinal population-based study.Early Child Dev Care. 2015 Feb 1;185(2):291-316. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2014.913586. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Early Child Dev Care. 2015. PMID: 25632172 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical