Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps
- PMID: 9807135
Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on monkey pulps.
Method and materials: Standardized Class V cavities were prepared in 112 teeth distributed in six healthy adult monkeys. The resin-modified glass-ionomer cement was placed in 24 nonexposed and 36 exposed pulps according to manufacturer's instructions. ZOE was used as a control in nonexposed pulps, while calcium hydroxide was used as a control for exposed pulps. Tissues were collected at 6 to 7, 21 to 27, and 90 to 97 days. After demineralization, the teeth were serially sectioned, stained, and observed by light microscopy.
Results: Except for one resin-modified glass-ionomer pulp at 6 days, there were no differences between the responses of nonexposed pulps to resin-modified glass-ionomer specimens and ZOE controls. In exposed pulps, eight of 36 resin-modified glass-ionomer pulps showed various grades of inflammatory response, all associated with stained bacteria. Pulpal healing was similar in both resin-modified glass-ionomer and calcium hydroxide direct-capped exposures. Twenty-two of 26 exposed pulps restored with the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement showed dentin bridge formation at 21 and 97 days.
Conclusion: The resin-modified glass-ionomer material exhibited acceptable biologic compatibility in exposed and nonexposed cavities.
Similar articles
-
Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.Quintessence Int. 2003 Jan;34(1):61-70. Quintessence Int. 2003. PMID: 12674361
-
Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.Am J Dent. 2000 Feb;13(1):28-34. Am J Dent. 2000. PMID: 11763899
-
Biocompatability of compomer restorative systems on nonexposed dental pulps of primate teeth.Oper Dent. 1997 Jul-Aug;22(4):149-58. Oper Dent. 1997. PMID: 9484155
-
Pulpal response to dental techniques and materials.Dent Clin North Am. 1971 Jan;15(1):115-26. Dent Clin North Am. 1971. PMID: 4923229 Review. No abstract available.
-
Pulpal studies: biocompatibility or effectiveness of marginal seal?Quintessence Int. 1990 Oct;21(10):775-9. Quintessence Int. 1990. PMID: 2082408 Review.
Cited by
-
The induction of dentin bridge-like structures by constructs of subcultured dental pulp-derived cells and porous HA/TCP in porcine teeth.Nagoya J Med Sci. 2009 Feb;71(1-2):51-62. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2009. PMID: 19358475 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice.J Vis Exp. 2017 Jan 12;(119):54973. doi: 10.3791/54973. J Vis Exp. 2017. PMID: 28117776 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of Er: YAG laser-assisted direct pulp capping in permanent teeth with carious exposure.Lasers Med Sci. 2025 May 23;40(1):242. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04496-7. Lasers Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40407835 Clinical Trial.
-
Invivo comparative evaluation of tertiary dentin deposit to three different luting cements a histopathological study.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sep;13(3):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0205-y. Epub 2012 Nov 1. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013. PMID: 24431735 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Molecular Perspectives of Reparative Dentin Formation: Lessons Learned from Pulp-Capping Materials and the Emerging Roles of Calcium.Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Jan;61(1):93-110. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2016.08.008. Dent Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 27912821 Free PMC article. Review.