Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998;17(6):579-89.
doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1998)17:6<579::aid-nau2>3.0.co;2-r.

Static magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor muscle morphology in women with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse

Affiliations

Static magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor muscle morphology in women with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse

R Tunn et al. Neurourol Urodyn. 1998.

Abstract

In a study, the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of 69 women were analyzed to define the typical MRI appearance of the pelvic floor musculature in healthy subjects (n = 20) and women with urinary incontinence (UI) and/or genitourinary prolapse (GP) (n = 49). The following parameters were determined: thickness and signal intensity of the levator muscles on each side, distance between the urethra and symphysis, diameter of the proximal urethra, and thickness and configuration of the anterior vaginal wall. These parameters were correlated with the patients' age and parity, urodynamic parameters, and the clinical assessment of the pelvic floor. In contrast to healthy subjects, the frequent findings in women with UI and/or GP are higher signal intensity of the levator muscles (p < 0.05) and loss of the hammock-like configuration of the vagina (p < 0.01). On static MRI, the morphometry of the levator musculature identified no findings typical of either UI or GP. Analysis of MRI combined with patients' parity suggests that the severity of damage to the pelvic floor at delivery is determined by the traumatic event as such and not by the number of deliveries. Urethral diameter, distance of the symphysis to the urethra, and vaginal wall thickness cannot distinguish between controls and women with UI and/or GP. Urodynamic and functional clinical parameters do not correlate with the changes in the pelvic floor musculature demonstrated by static MRI. Although morphological changes in UI and/or GP can be demonstrated by MRI, they can be assigned a pathogenic role only if clinical symptoms are present.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources