Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Nov;35(6):481-8.
doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1998_035_0481_vffsat_2.3.co_2.

Velopharyngeal function for speech after the Frolova primary palatoplasty technique

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Velopharyngeal function for speech after the Frolova primary palatoplasty technique

W N Williams et al. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken by several members of the University of Florida Craniofacial Center to assess the results of palatoplasty performed by the method devised by Larisa Y. Frolova, M.D. in 1971.

Design: The assessment was based on evaluation of each subject's speech and velopharyngeal function through perceptual measures, nasometry, and video-nasendoscopy.

Setting: The study took place at the National Pediatric Center for Congenital Maxillofacial Pathology, Moscow, Russia, under the auspices and with the cooperation of Dr. Frolova, director of the program.

Subjects: One hundred twelve children (40 girls and 72 boys; age range, 4 to 10 years; mean age, 7.5 years) with repaired cleft palate who had undergone palatoplasty 2 to 4 years earlier and had no secondary surgery were randomly selected from the center's clinical files by the staff. Subjects with known conditions that could jeopardize normal speech development were excluded.

Methods: Each subject was assessed for speech and velopharyngeal function with a battery of perceptual measures and videonasendoscopy.

Results: The percentage of subjects judged to have normal resonance was 55.5%. An additional 9.5% of the subjects judged to be hyponasal increased the rate of nonhypernasal outcome to 64%.

Conclusions: The Furlow double-Z palatoplasty has had an increasing rate of success (up to 87%), whereas the Frolova technique has a success rate of only 55% to 65%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources