Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Nov;41(11):1327-36.
doi: 10.1007/s001250051073.

Evidence for direct action of alloxan to induce insulin resistance at the cellular level

Affiliations

Evidence for direct action of alloxan to induce insulin resistance at the cellular level

M Ader et al. Diabetologia. 1998 Nov.

Abstract

To determine whether long-term insulin deficiency alters insulin movement across the endothelium, plasma and lymph dynamics were assessed in dogs after alloxan (50 mg/kg; n = 8) or saline injection (n = 6). Glucose tolerance (KG) and acute insulin response were assessed by glucose injection before and 18 days after treatment. Two days later, hyperglycaemic (16.7 mmol/l) hyperinsulinaemic (60 pmol x min(-1) x kg(-1)) glucose clamps were carried out in a subset of dogs (n = 5 for each group), with simultaneous sampling of arterial blood and hindlimb lymph. Alloxan induced fasting hyperglycaemia (12.9 +/- 2.3 vs 5.7 +/- 0.2 mmol/l; p = 0.018 vs pre-treatment) and variable insulinopenia (62 +/- 14 vs 107 +/- 19 pmol/l; p = 0.079). The acute insulin response, however, was suppressed by alloxan (integrated insulin from 0-10 min: 155 +/- 113 vs 2745 +/- 541 pmol x l(-1) x 10 min(-1); p = 0.0027), resulting in pronounced glucose intolerance (KG: 0.99 +/- 0.19 vs 3.14 +/- 0.38 min(-1); p = 0.0002 vs dogs treated with saline). During clamps, steady state arterial insulin was higher in dogs treated with alloxan (688 +/- 60 vs 502 +/- 38 pmol/l; p = 0.023) due to a 25% reduction in insulin clearance (p = 0.045). Lymph insulin concentrations were also raised (361 +/- 15 vs 266 +/- 27 pmol/l; p = 0.023), such that the lymph to arterial ratio was unchanged by alloxan (0.539 +/- 0.022 vs 0.533 +/- 0.033; p = 0.87). Despite higher lymph insulin, glucose uptake (Rd) was significantly diminished after injection of alloxan (45.4 +/- 2.5 vs 64.3 +/- 6.5 micromol x min(-1) x kg(-1); p = 0.042). This was reflected in resistance of target tissues to the lymph insulin signal (deltaRd/ delta lymph insulin: 3.389 +/- 1.093 vs 11.635 +/- 2.057 x 10(-6) x l x min(-1) x kg(-1) x pmol(-1) x l(-1); p = 0.012) which correlated strongly with the KG (r = 0.86; p = 0.0001). In conclusion, alloxan induces insulinopenic diabetes, with glucose intolerance and insulin resistance at the target tissue level. Alloxan treatment, however, does not alter lymph insulin kinetics, indicating that insulin resistance of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus reflects direct impairment at the cellular level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources