Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Jul-Aug;2(4):385-90.
doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80079-6.

Evolving management of mild-to-moderate gallstone pancreatitis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evolving management of mild-to-moderate gallstone pancreatitis

S K Srinathan et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 1998 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe recent trends in the management of mild-to-moderate gallstone pancreatitis and assess patient outcomes. Acute gallstone pancreatitis has traditionally been managed with open cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiography during the initial hospitalization. The popularization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy has made a reassessment necessary. Two consecutive time periods were retrospectively analyzed: prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (prelaparoscopic era [PLE]) and after the diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (laparoscopic cholectomy era [LCE]). There were 35 patients in the PLE group and 58 in the LCE group. LCE patients waited 37.1 +/- 63 days from admission until cholecystectomy, compared to 9.8 +/- 14.8 days in the PLE group (P = 0.04). Biliary-pancreatic complications occurred in 24% of LCE patients and only 6% of PLE patients (P = 0.05), nearly always while they were awaiting cholecystectomy (P = 0.009). Patients in either time period who underwent cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography developed less pancreatic-biliary complications than those who underwent ERCP prior to cholecystectomy, with or without sphincterotomy. Delaying the interval from pancreatitis to laparoscopic cholecystectomy beyond historical values is associated with a greater risk of recurrent biliary-pancreatic complications, which are not prevented by the use of ERCP. Early cholecys tectomy with intraoperative ductal evaluation is still the approach of choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gut. 1995 Jul;37(1):119-20 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996 Apr;31(4):411-4 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):515-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1982 Sep;77(9):633-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1992 Feb;163(2):221-6 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources