Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Dec;31(6):393-412.
doi: 10.1006/cbmr.1998.1489.

Split-and-merge segmentation of magnetic resonance medical images: performance evaluation and extension to three dimensions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Split-and-merge segmentation of magnetic resonance medical images: performance evaluation and extension to three dimensions

I N Manousakas et al. Comput Biomed Res. 1998 Dec.

Abstract

Intensity- or edge-based methods of segmentation are often insufficiently robust to be applied to images containing complex anatomical objects, such as those seen in high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging systems. Split-and-merge techniques attempt to overcome these difficulties by using homogeneity measures. Simple modifications to the basic 2D split-and-merge method, based on the principles of simulated annealing and controlled boundary elimination, are developed and discussed. Simulated annealing reduced the number of regions by 22% with a further reduction of 21% achieved through boundary elimination. Smoother regional boundaries are also produced. These methods are extended to true 3D and quantitatively compared with their 2D counterparts. The main advantage of 3D methods is that they produce segmented volumes by directly preserving the connectivity between slices, whereas in 2D, segments have to be grouped together in a post-split-and-merge process. Finally, the properties of the 3D approach are demonstrated by the automatic quantitation of brain ventricle volume, producing estimates to within 7% of validated manual methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources