Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 1998 Dec 12;317(7173):1624-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7173.1624.

Intranasal corticosteroids versus oral H1 receptor antagonists in allergic rhinitis: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Intranasal corticosteroids versus oral H1 receptor antagonists in allergic rhinitis: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

J M Weiner et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether intranasal corticosteroids are superior to oral H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Design: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing intranasal corticosteroids with oral antihistamines.

Setting: Randomised controlled trials conducted worldwide and published between 1966 and 1997.

Subjects: 2267 subjects with allergic rhinitis in 16 randomised controlled trials.

Main outcome measures: Nasal blockage, nasal discharge, sneezing, nasal itch, postnasal drip, nasal discomfort, total nasal symptoms, nasal resistance, and eye symptoms and global ratings. Outcomes measured on different scales were combined to determine pooled odds ratios (categorical outcomes) or standardised mean differences (continuous outcomes). Assessment of heterogeneity between studies, and subgroup analyses of eye symptoms, were undertaken.

Results: Intranasal corticosteroids produced significantly greater relief than oral antihistamines of nasal blockage (standardised mean difference 0.63, 95% confidence interval - 0.73 to - 0.53), nasal discharge (-0.5, - 0.6 to - 0.4), sneezing (- 0.49, - 0.59 to - 0.39), nasal itch (- 0.38,- 0.49 to - 0.21), postnasal drip (- 0.24,- 0.42 to - 0.06), and total nasal symptoms (- 0.42,- 0.53 to - 0.32), and global ratings gave an odds ratio for deterioration of symptoms of 0.26 (0.08 to 0.8). There were no significant differences between treatments for nasal discomfort, nasal resistance, or eye symptoms. The effects on sneezing, total nasal symptoms, and eye symptoms were significantly heterogeneous between studies. Other combined outcomes were homogeneous between studies. Subgroup analysis of the outcome of eye symptoms suggested that the duration of assessment (averaged mean score over the study period versus mean score at end of study period) might have accounted for the heterogeneity.

Conclusion: The results of this systematic review, together with data on safety and cost effectiveness, support the use of intranasal corticosteroids over oral antihistamines as first line treatment for allergic rhinitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of effectiveness of intranasal corticosteroids and oral H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) on nasal symptoms
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of effects of intranasal corticosteroids and oral H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) on total nasal symptom scores
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of effects of intranasal corticosteroids and oral H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) on eye symptoms

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Rhinitis Management Working Group. International consensus report on the diagnosis and management of rhinitis. Allergy. 1994;49(suppl 19):1–34. - PubMed
    1. Fleming DM, Crombie LD. Prevalence of hay fever in England and Wales. BMJ. 1987;294:279–283. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aberg N. Asthma and allergic rhinitis in Swedish conscripts. Clin Exp Allergy. 1989;19:59–63. - PubMed
    1. Hopper T, Jenkin M, Carlin C, Giles G. Increase in the self-reported prevalence of asthma and hay fever in adults over the past generation. Aust J Pub Health. 1995;19:120–124. - PubMed
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1989-90. National health survey. Asthma and other respiratory conditions. Australia: Commonwealth Government Printer; 1991.

MeSH terms

Substances