[Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects]
- PMID: 9849051
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03042675
[Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects]
Abstract
Background: Infections are a major cause of mortality in neutropenic patients. They require long hospital stays and highly expensive therapeutic measures. In this review we discuss the practical and pharmaco-economic aspects of the management of febrile neutropenia.
Prevention and therapy: Prevention of fever of unknown origin (FUO) demands hygienic and antimicrobiotic measures. First-line antibiotic therapy consists of an aminoglycoside combined with an ureidopenicillin or a 3rd-generation cephalosporin. Double beta-lactam antibiotic combinations are equally effective and less toxic, but more expensive. Monotherapy with carbapenems, ceftazidime, or cefepime appear to offer comparable efficacy. Lung infiltrates require immediate treatment with amphotericin B. If the initial therapeutic regime fails, a carbapenem plus a glycopeptide antibiotic and a parenteral antimycotic drug should be applied after 3 to 4 days. The prophylactic or interventional administration of hematopoietic growth factors is only indicated in special high-risk situations.
Conclusions: Using the described therapeutic procedure, the response rate exceeds 90%. Consistent, step-wise escalating administration of antibiotics is essential. More evaluation is needed to determine whether selected patients with febrile neutropenia can be treated on an outpatient basis.
Similar articles
-
Clinical guidelines for the management of neutropenic patients with unexplained fever in Japan: validation by the Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Dec;26 Suppl 2:S123-7; discussion S133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Oct 24. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005. PMID: 16249072
-
Cost-effectiveness of cefepime + netilmicin or ceftazidime + amikacin or meropenem monotherapy in febrile neutropenic children with malignancy in Turkey.J Chemother. 2001 Jun;13(3):281-7. doi: 10.1179/joc.2001.13.3.281. J Chemother. 2001. PMID: 11450887 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost effectiveness of cephalosporin monotherapy and aminoglycoside/ureidopenicillin combination therapy. For the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Oct;18(4):369-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018040-00005. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000. PMID: 15344305
-
[Prevention and treatment of febrile neutropenia].Tumori. 1997;83(2 Suppl):S15-9. Tumori. 1997. PMID: 9235724 Review. Italian.
-
[Empirical antimicrobial therapy in neutropenic patients].Ther Umsch. 1996 Nov;53(11):854-62. Ther Umsch. 1996. PMID: 8984691 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness in diagnosis of patients with long-standing fever.Wien Med Wochenschr. 2003;153(9-10):202-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1563-258x.2003.02112.x. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2003. PMID: 12836456