Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Sep;80(5):326-31.

Periampullary diverticula: consequences of failed ERCP

Affiliations

Periampullary diverticula: consequences of failed ERCP

D N Lobo et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998 Sep.

Abstract

Periampullary diverticula (PAD) are associated with biliary disease and contribute to failure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), especially in elderly patients. The presence of PAD and causes of failure to cannulate the ampulla were noted in 1211 consecutive patients undergoing ERCP. Case notes of 100 consecutive patients with PAD were reviewed retrospectively. Overall prevalence of PAD was 9%. Prevalence was higher in patients > or = 75 years when compared with those < 75 years (19.2% vs 4.8%, P < 0.0001). Ampullary cannulation was successful in 62.4% of patients with PAD and 92.7% without PAD (P < 0.0001). Success rates were lower in patients with intradiverticular papillae than in those with juxtapapillary diverticula (38.1% vs 77.6%; P < 0.0001). Of 19 patients with PAD who did not have any imaging other than ultrasound, 16 were asymptomatic over a median follow-up of 20 months. Biliary surgery was performed on 35 patients, with no major complication. PAD are a major cause of failed ERCP. Failure rates are higher in patients with intradiverticular papillae than juxtapapillary diverticula. Though a large proportion of patients not imaged remain asymptomatic on follow-up, it is difficult to predict which patients may form this group. Surgery, when indicated, is safe and effective in elderly patients in whom ERCP has failed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World J Surg. 1995 Mar-Apr;19(2):307-12 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989 Aug;24(6):649-56 - PubMed
    1. Clin Radiol. 1981 Mar;32(2):173-6 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1984 May;19(3):329-33 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):353-5 - PubMed