Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Nov;13(11):3057-60.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3057.

A 2-year comparative study of endometrial histology and cervical cytology of contraceptive implant users in Birmingham, UK

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A 2-year comparative study of endometrial histology and cervical cytology of contraceptive implant users in Birmingham, UK

L Mascarenhas et al. Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the endometrial histology and cervical cytology of users of two contraceptive implants releasing etonogestrel/3-keto-desogestrel (Implanon) and levonorgestrel (Norplant) in West Midlands (UK) users. A 2-year prospective randomized design was used to study 60 implant users. Endometrial histology and cervical cytology were compared before insertion and after 12 and 24 months. At the end of 12 months, the majority of samples were inactive/weakly proliferative in both groups. At the end of 24 months, this remained unchanged in the Implanon group whereas the pattern was more diverse in the Norplant group. Endometrial thickness was significantly reduced in both groups during treatment. Cervical cytology remained unchanged. It is concluded that, after 2 years, there was no evidence of an increasing risk of endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial carcinoma, cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia or cervical carcinoma in either of the two groups of implant users.

PIP: Changes in endometrial histology and cervical cytology related to use of two contraceptive implants were investigated in a 2-year prospective study conducted at Birmingham (UK) Women's Hospital. 60 women with regular menstrual cycles were randomly assigned to receive either Implanon (etonogestrel/3-keto-desogestrel) or Norplant (levonorgestrel). After 12 months of implant use, most endometrial samples in both groups were inactive or only weakly proliferative. After 24 months, this pattern remained unchanged in the Implanon group. It was more diverse, however, in the Norplant group, where there was evidence of proliferative-phase endometrium. Endometrial thickness, assessed quarterly by transvaginal ultrasound scans, was significantly reduced in users of both implants. Cervical cytology remained unchanged from baseline to 24 months. These findings suggest that users of both implant systems are not at increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial carcinoma, cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia, or cervical carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms