Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. A pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up
- PMID: 9854761
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199812010-00017
Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. A pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up
Abstract
Study design: A multicenter, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.
Objectives: To evaluate the efficiency of progressively graded medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise by walking in patients with chronic low back pain.
Summary and background data: Varieties of medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy are considered to reduce symptoms, improve function, and decrease sickness absence, but this opinion is controversial.
Methods: Patients with chronic low back pain or radicular pain sick-listed for more than 8 weeks and less than 52 weeks (Sickness Certificate II) were included. The treatment lasted 3 months (36 treatments). Pain intensity, functional ability, patient satisfaction, return to work, number of days on sick leave, and costs were recorded.
Results: Of the 208 patients included in this study, 71 were randomly assigned to medical exercise therapy, 67 to conventional physiotherapy, and 70 to self-exercise. Thirty-three (15.8%) patients dropped out during the treatment period. No difference was observed between the medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy groups, but both were significantly better than self-exercise group. Patient satisfaction was highest for medical exercise therapy. Return to work rates were equal for all 3 intervention groups at assessment 15 months after therapy was started, with 123 patients were back to work. In terms of costs for days on sick leave, the medical exercise therapy group saved 906,732 Norwegian Kroner (NOK) ($122,531.00), and the conventional physiotherapy group saved NOK 1,882,560 ($254,200.00), compared with the self-exercise group.
Conclusions: The efficiency of medical exercise therapy and conventional physiotherapy is shown. Leaving patients with chronic low back pain untampered poses a risk of worsening the disability, resulting in longer periods of sick leave.
Comment in
-
The pain of Sognsvann walks.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jan;25(1):137. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200001010-00023. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000. PMID: 10647172 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A walking programme and a supervised exercise class versus usual physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial. (The Supervised Walking In comparison to Fitness Training for Back Pain (SWIFT) Trial).BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jul 2;10:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-79. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009. PMID: 19573247 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Manual therapy and exercise therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Mar 15;28(6):525-31; discussion 531-2. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000049921.04200.A6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 12642755 Clinical Trial.
-
Multidisciplinary intensive functional restoration versus outpatient active physiotherapy in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):2235-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182191e13. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011. PMID: 21415807 Clinical Trial.
-
[Is exercise therapy and manipulation effective in low back pain?].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 May 30;119(14):2042-50. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999. PMID: 10394281 Clinical Trial. Norwegian.
-
Exercise reduces sick leave in patients with non-acute non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis.J Rehabil Med. 2004 Mar;36(2):49-62. doi: 10.1080/16501970310020104. J Rehabil Med. 2004. PMID: 15180219 Review.
Cited by
-
Motor control exercise for chronic non-specific low-back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 8;2016(1):CD012004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012004. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 26742533 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: a one-year prospective study.J Occup Rehabil. 2003 Mar;13(1):1-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1021823505774. J Occup Rehabil. 2003. PMID: 12611026 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevalence of back pain and the knowledge of preventive measures in a cohort of 11619 Polish school-age children and youth-an epidemiological study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15729. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015729. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31145287 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of classification-specific treatment on lumbopelvic motion during hip rotation in people with low back pain.Man Ther. 2011 Aug;16(4):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Jan 20. Man Ther. 2011. PMID: 21256073 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of four physiotherapy regimens in the treatment of long-term mechanical low back pain.J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc. 2010;13(1):9-16. doi: 10.1298/jjpta.13.9. J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc. 2010. PMID: 25792891 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources