A multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized comparison of oral levofloxacin and oral clarithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis
- PMID: 9855324
A multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized comparison of oral levofloxacin and oral clarithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis
Abstract
A multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted to compare oral levofloxacin 500 mg once/day for 14 days with clarithromycin 500 mg twice/day for 14 days in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. Of 216 adult outpatients randomized to treatment, 190 were evaluable for efficacy. The primary efficacy measure was clinical response, based on resolution of signs and symptoms 2-5 days after therapy. A secondary efficacy measure was relapse rate 1 month after therapy. Among evaluable patients, clinical success rates (cured or improved) were 96.0% and 93.3% for levofloxacin (L) and clarithromycin (C), respectively (95% CI -9.2%, 3.7%). The confidence interval (CI) for treatment difference (C-L) included zero and its upper limit was less than 15%, indicating that levofloxacin was as effective as clarithromycin. In all, 4.1% of patients receiving levofloxacin and 7.2% receiving clarithromycin had a relapse of symptoms 1 month after therapy (95% CI-12.2%, 3.2%). Long-term success (initial success, absence of relapse at 1 month, no further antibacterial therapy 2-5 days after therapy) was 79.2% in the levofloxacin group and 76.4% in the clarithromycin group (95% CI -14.7%, 9.0%). Based on investigator-assessed treatment-emergent adverse events, overall tolerability of the drugs was similar, except for a higher frequency of taste perversion and diarrhea in the clarithromycin group. Levofloxacin had an advantage over clarithromycin based on two quality-of-life (QOL) parameters: number of times taking other drugs for targeted medical conditions and mean total cost of these drugs. No statistical significance was found in other QOL variables. These findings suggest that the efficacy and tolerability of levofloxacin 500 mg once/day are comparable with those of clarithromycin 500 mg twice/day in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.
Similar articles
-
Cefdinir versus levofloxacin in patients with acute rhinosinusitis of presumed bacterial etiology: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.Clin Ther. 2004 Dec;26(12):2026-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.004. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15823766 Clinical Trial.
-
Open-label assessment of levofloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in adults.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998 Apr;80(4):357-62. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62983-3. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998. PMID: 9564988 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of cefditoren pivoxil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in Thailand: a randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled trial.Clin Ther. 2008 Oct;30(10):1870-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.10.001. Clin Ther. 2008. PMID: 19014842 Clinical Trial.
-
Levofloxacin: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.Drugs. 2002;62(14):2127-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262140-00013. Drugs. 2002. PMID: 12269858 Review.
-
Clarithromycin extended-release tablet: a review of its use in the management of respiratory tract infections.Am J Respir Med. 2003;2(2):175-201. doi: 10.1007/BF03256648. Am J Respir Med. 2003. PMID: 14720016 Review.
Cited by
-
A critical review of the fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory infections.Drugs. 2002;62(1):13-59. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262010-00002. Drugs. 2002. PMID: 11790155 Review.
-
In vitro activity and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic parameters of clarithromycin and azithromycin: why they matter in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Mar 8;12:585-596. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S187226. eCollection 2019. Infect Drug Resist. 2019. PMID: 30881064 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A risk-benefit assessment of levofloxacin in respiratory, skin and skin structure, and urinary tract infections.Drug Saf. 2001;24(3):199-222. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124030-00004. Drug Saf. 2001. PMID: 11347723 Review.
-
The use of macrolides in treatment of upper respiratory tract infections.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2006 Mar;6(2):171-81. doi: 10.1007/s11882-006-0056-x. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2006. PMID: 16566868 Review.
-
Oral fluoroquinolones in the treatment of pneumonia, bronchitis and sinusitis.Can J Infect Dis. 2002 Sep;13(5):293-300. doi: 10.1155/2002/698146. Can J Infect Dis. 2002. PMID: 18159405 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical