Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study
- PMID: 9856763
Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the baseline findings in patients enrolled in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study.
Methods: This is a longitudinal observational study of 1209 patients with keratoconus enrolled at 16 clinical centers. Its main outcome measures are corneal scarring, visual acuity, keratometry, and quality of life.
Results: The CLEK Study patients had a mean age of 39.29+/-10.90 years with moderate to severe disease, assessed by a keratometric-based criterion (95.4% of patients had steep keratometric readings of at least 45 D) and relatively good visual acuity (77.9% had best corrected visual acuity of at least 20/40 in both eyes). Sixty-five percent of the patients wore rigid gas-permeable contact lens, and most of those (73%) reported that their lenses were comfortable. Only 13.5% of patients reported a family history of keratoconus. None reported serious systemic diseases that had been previously reported to be associated with keratoconus. Many (53%) reported a history of atopy. Fifty-three percent had corneal scarring in one or both eyes.
Conclusions: Baseline findings suggest that keratoconus is not associated with increased risk of connective tissue disease and that most patients in the CLEK Study sample represent mild to moderate keratoconus. Additional follow-up of at least 3 years will provide new information about the progression of keratoconus, identify factors associated with progression, and assess its impact on quality of life.
Similar articles
-
A summary of the findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. CLEK Study Group.Optometry. 2001 Sep;72(9):574-84. Optometry. 2001. PMID: 11575695 Clinical Trial.
-
Baseline factors predictive of incident penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus.Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;142(6):923-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.026. Epub 2006 Sep 1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 17157577
-
Rigid contact lens fitting relationships in keratoconus. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group.Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Oct;76(10):692-9. Optom Vis Sci. 1999. PMID: 10524784
-
Keratoconus.Optom Clin. 1995;4(3):65-73. Optom Clin. 1995. PMID: 7767020 Review.
-
[Keratoconus].Duodecim. 2010;126(2):152-8. Duodecim. 2010. PMID: 20405600 Review. Finnish.
Cited by
-
Case Report: What Are We Doing for Our "20/20 Unhappy" Scleral Lens Patients?Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Sep;97(9):826-830. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001563. Optom Vis Sci. 2020. PMID: 32941339 Free PMC article.
-
Comment on 'Cost effectiveness of collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in the UK NHS'.Eye (Lond). 2016 Aug;30(8):1150-2. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.82. Epub 2016 Apr 22. Eye (Lond). 2016. PMID: 27101748 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Response to: Comment on 'Cost effectiveness of collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in the UK NHS'.Eye (Lond). 2016 Aug;30(8):1152-3. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.85. Epub 2016 Apr 22. Eye (Lond). 2016. PMID: 27101750 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Post Filtering Surgery Globe Massage-induced Keratoconus in an Eye with Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Brief Review.J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;11(3):319-22. doi: 10.4103/2008-322X.158896. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016. PMID: 27621792 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping Keratoconus Molecular Substrates by Multiplexed High-Resolution Proteomics of Unpooled Corneas.OMICS. 2019 Nov;23(11):583-597. doi: 10.1089/omi.2019.0143. Epub 2019 Oct 25. OMICS. 2019. PMID: 31651220 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical