Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: a study of 58 cases
- PMID: 9860413
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00708.x
Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: a study of 58 cases
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the diagnosis of biliary tree obstruction.
Methods: Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent MRC (GYROSCAN ACS II 1.5 Tesla, TSE T2 axial/coronal-MIP sequences) for clinical and biochemical signs of main bile duct obstruction. MRC images were interpreted by two radiologists and consensus was established according to presence or absence of main bile duct dilation, choledocholithiasis, and malignant or benign stricture. MRC was compared to a final diagnosis established by ultrasound and CT in 19 cases, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 25, intraoperative cholangiography and exploration in 14, and clinical, biochemical, and histological presentation when relevant. Included were single or multiple choledocholithiasis (28, including 11 < or = 3 mm), malignant (10) and benign (12) strictures, and intrahepatic cholestasis (9).
Results: Overall, MRC was sensitive (94%) and specific (92%) in detecting main bile duct dilation and choledocholithiasis (86 % and 97 %), but was less sensitive (64%) for small stones < or = 3 mm. Sensitivity for stones > 3 mm was 100%. For benign and malignant strictures, MRC was less sensitive (67% and 80%) but remained specific (98% and 96%). In the detection of normal main bile duct, MRC was highly sensitive (100%) and specific (94%). Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 91% to 98%.
Conclusion: MRC appears to be specific for choledocholithiasis and sensitive except for small stones. Results for biliary stricture are less satisfactory, but remain specific. Our data confirm that MRC can be useful in the diagnostic workup of main bile duct obstruction.
Similar articles
-
Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones.Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Aug;96(8):2354-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04045.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001. PMID: 11513174
-
Magnetic resonance cholangiography using half-Fourier acquisition for diagnosing choledocholithiasis.Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Oct;93(10):1886-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00543.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998. PMID: 9772049
-
Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.Am J Surg. 1997 Jul;174(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00022-6. Am J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9240949
-
Magnetic resonance imaging and diseases of the liver and biliary tract. Part 2. Magnetic resonance cholangiography and angiography and conclusions.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 Sep;15(9):992-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02277.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000. PMID: 11059927 Review.
-
Malignant stricture at the confluence of the biliary tree: diagnosis and management.Surg Annu. 1985;17:125-41. Surg Annu. 1985. PMID: 2983445 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Gallbladder wall thickening: MR imaging and pathologic correlation with emphasis on layered pattern.Eur Radiol. 2005 Apr;15(4):694-701. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2539-2. Epub 2004 Nov 24. Eur Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15565318
-
Diagnostic approach to patients with cholestatic jaundice.World J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jun;5(3):252-262. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i3.252. World J Gastroenterol. 1999. PMID: 11819442 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy.Surg Endosc. 2009 May;23(5):950-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0339-0. Epub 2009 Mar 6. Surg Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19266236 Review.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 26;2015(2):CD011549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011549. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25719224 Free PMC article.
-
[Comparison of 2D and 3D sequences for MRCP. Clinical value of the different techniques].Radiologe. 2005 Nov;45(11):993-4, 996-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00117-005-1283-1. Radiologe. 2005. PMID: 16217638 Review. German.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical