Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998;19(5):434-7.

Intraperitoneal contrast material combined with CT for detection of peritoneal metastases of ovarian cancer

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9863905
Clinical Trial

Intraperitoneal contrast material combined with CT for detection of peritoneal metastases of ovarian cancer

S Gryspeerdt et al. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of CT-peritoneography (CT-P) in detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis in primary or recurrent ovarian cancer.

Methods: Twenty-five patients were submitted to a standard abdominal CT (CT) as well as a computed tomography after intraperitoneal infusion of contrast material (CT-P). Twenty patients had ovarian masses clinically suspected to be malignant. In five patients with ovarian cancer who underwent prior debulking surgery, recurrent disease was suspected.

Results: In 21/25 patients an ovarian malignancy was histologically confirmed. During surgery peritoneal spread was found in 13 patients; only in 5 cases CT correctly suggested peritoneal metastases (sensitivity 38%). However, in 10/13 women CT-P indicated peritoneal spread, increasing the overall sensitivity from 38% to 77%. Sensitivity varied substantially according to the different abdominal areas, and was lowest in the left subphrenic space (25%). The sensitivity of CT-P was 71% and 72% in the right paracolic gutter and the pelvis, respectively. Sensitivity of CT-P was not found to be size-dependent, but was mainly related to the morphology of the lesions, with 100% sensitivity in nodular lesions, and only 21% sensitivity for flat peritoneal lesions. CT-P did not improve detection of omental metastases, and was not advantageous when ascites was present. Previous surgery reduced overall specificity from 80% to 57%.

Conclusion: CT-P greatly improved the sensitivity of CT in the preoperative detection of peritoneal spread of ovarian malignancy. However, the technique failed to detect flat peritoneal metastases, and had a low specificity in patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms