Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998;140(11):1167-70; discussion 1170-1.
doi: 10.1007/s007010050232.

Wrapping of solitary ruptured intracranial aneurysms, outcome at five years

Affiliations

Wrapping of solitary ruptured intracranial aneurysms, outcome at five years

S A Cudlip et al. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998.

Abstract

Previous follow up studies of patients who have had ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by a wrapping technique have largely been in the pre-microsurgical era. Our objective was to ascertain whether wrapping aneurysms with the aid of the operating microscope provides protection against rebleeding in the short and long term. The study involved retrospective analysis of patients with ruptured aneurysms treated by wrapping over a six-year period. Twenty-nine patients were identified with wrapped aneurysms, of these 15 had wrapping of a solitary ruptured aneurysm, the remainder were excluded because of clip/wrap combination, multiple aneurysms, and unruptured aneurysms. Of the 15 patients who had a solitary ruptured aneurysm wrapped, none had rebled at one year follow up. One patient died of a myocardial infarction at 4 years, the remaining 14 patients had no episodes of rebleeding with all patients achieving Glasgow outcome scores of four or five at 5 years follow-up. Although surgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms is the definitive method of treatment, our findings suggest that wrapping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the aid of the operating microscope confers good protection against both early and late rebleeding in those cases considered 'unclippable'.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources