Early abortion. Update and implications for midwifery practice
- PMID: 9871382
- DOI: 10.1016/s0091-2182(98)00057-3
Early abortion. Update and implications for midwifery practice
Abstract
Medical abortion using methotrexate and misoprostol and manual vacuum aspiration are two new methods for pregnancy termination during the first 8 weeks of gestation. Compared to the regimen of mifepristone (RU 486) and misoprostol, both methods offer high rates of complete abortion and acceptability to users. Limitations of the new two-drug regimen compared with mifepristone include a longer time to effect abortion, transient gastrointestinal side effects, and risk of potential teratogenicity from methotrexate's cytotoxicity. Compared to standard surgical abortion, both methods allow women to avoid surgery, are more privately performed, and may be more easily accessible. The safety of first-trimester abortion provided by nurse practitioners and physician assistants has been established. Whether midwives and either new method to their practices depends on several factors. These include obtaining appropriate training, overcoming legal restrictions, and meeting professional and personal challenges inherent in providing early abortion care.
PIP: This article reviews two new methods--combined methotrexate and misoprostol administration and manual vacuum aspiration--suitable for abortion during the first 8 weeks of pregnancy. This review discusses the pharmacology of methotrexate and misoprostol, summarizes research on the regimen's effectiveness and acceptability, and presents a sample protocol of its clinical use. The 2-drug regimen has a longer treatment-abortion interval than the mifepristone-misoprostol combination; other limitations include transient gastrointestinal effects and a risk of potential teratogenicity from methotrexate's cytotoxicity. However, the regimen has high efficacy and acceptability. Incorporation of abortion services into midwifery practices would expand the number of abortion providers in the US. Whether nurse-midwives become able to perform this function depends on obtaining adequate training, overcoming legal restrictions, and meeting the professional and personal challenges inherent in early pregnancy termination.
Similar articles
-
Low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol for abortion.Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00150-4. Contraception. 1999. PMID: 10342079 Clinical Trial.
-
Pregnancy interruption using mifepristone (RU-486). A new choice for women in the USA.J Nurse Midwifery. 1997 Mar-Apr;42(2):86-90. doi: 10.1016/s0091-2182(96)00154-1. J Nurse Midwifery. 1997. PMID: 9107115 Review.
-
Alternatives to mifepristone regimens for medical abortion.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;183(2 Suppl):S54-64. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.107949. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000. PMID: 10944370 Review.
-
Abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol: regimens, efficacy, acceptability and future directions.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;183(2 Suppl):S44-53. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.107950. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000. PMID: 10944369 Review.
-
Randomized trial of misoprostol and cervagem in combination with a reduced dose of mifepristone for induction of abortion.Hum Reprod. 1995 Jun;10(6):1521-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.6.1521. Hum Reprod. 1995. PMID: 7593528 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical