A 'sticky' interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder?
- PMID: 9872002
- PMCID: PMC1689515
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0551
A 'sticky' interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder?
Abstract
Despite years of research into bipolar disorder (manic depression), its underlying pathophysiology remains elusive. It is widely acknowledged that the disorder is strongly heritable, but the genetics are complex with less than full concordance in monozygotic twins and at least four susceptibility loci identified. We propose that bipolar disorder is the result of a genetic propensity for slow interhemispheric switching mechanisms that become 'stuck' in one or the other state. Because slow switches are also 'sticky' when compared with fast switches, the clinical manifestations of bipolar disorder may be explained by hemispheric activation being 'stuck' on the left (mania) or on the right (depression). Support for this 'sticky' interhemispheric switching hypothesis stems from our recent observation that the rate of perceptual alternation in binocular rivalry is slow in euthymic subjects with bipolar disorder (n = 18, median = 0.27 Hz) compared with normal controls (n = 49, median = 0.60 Hz, p < 0.0005). We have presented evidence elsewhere that binocular rivalry is itself an interhemispheric switching phenomenon. The rivalry alternation rate (putative interhemispheric switch rate) is robust in a given individual, with a test-retest correlation of more than 0.8, making it suitable for genetic studies. The interhemispheric switch rate may provide a trait-dependent biological marker for bipolar disorder.
Similar articles
-
Further evidence for slow binocular rivalry rate as a trait marker for bipolar disorder.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;47(4):371-9. doi: 10.1177/0004867412474105. Epub 2013 Jan 22. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 23341474
-
Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry.Curr Biol. 2000 Apr 6;10(7):383-92. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00416-4. Curr Biol. 2000. PMID: 10753744
-
Difference in binocular rivalry rate between patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorders.Bipolar Disord. 2009 Aug;11(5):539-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00719.x. Bipolar Disord. 2009. PMID: 19624393
-
Dichoptic viewing methods for binocular rivalry research: prospects for large-scale clinical and genetic studies.Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013 Dec;16(6):1033-78. doi: 10.1017/thg.2013.76. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013. PMID: 24274165 Review.
-
How does binocular rivalry emerge from cortical mechanisms of 3-D vision?Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2232-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.024. Epub 2008 Aug 13. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18640145 Review.
Cited by
-
Individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties.Ind Psychiatry J. 2011 Jan;20(1):32-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-6748.98412. Ind Psychiatry J. 2011. PMID: 22969178 Free PMC article.
-
Microstructural white matter changes in the corpus callosum of young people with Bipolar Disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study.PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059108. Epub 2013 Mar 19. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23527101 Free PMC article.
-
Bipolar and schizophrenic patients differ in patterns of visual motion discrimination.Schizophr Res. 2006 Dec;88(1-3):208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Jul 17. Schizophr Res. 2006. PMID: 16844346 Free PMC article.
-
A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.J Comput Neurosci. 2002 Jan-Feb;12(1):39-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1014942129705. J Comput Neurosci. 2002. PMID: 11932559 Review.
-
Binocular vision.Vision Res. 2011 Apr 13;51(7):754-70. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Oct 15. Vision Res. 2011. PMID: 20951722 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical