Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Jan;107(1):27-35.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.9910727.

Human health risk assessment in relation to environmental pollution of two artificial freshwater lakes in The Netherlands

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Human health risk assessment in relation to environmental pollution of two artificial freshwater lakes in The Netherlands

H J Albering et al. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jan.

Abstract

A human health risk assessment has been performed in relation to recreational activities on two artificial freshwater lakes along the river Meuse in The Netherlands. Although the discharges of contaminants into the river Meuse have been reduced in the last decades, which is reflected in decreasing concentrations of pollutants in surface water and suspended matter, the levels in sediments are more persistent. Sediments of the two freshwater lakes appear highly polluted and may pose a health risk in relation to recreational activities. To quantify health risks for carcinogenic (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) as well as noncarcinogenic compounds (e.g., heavy metals), an exposure assessment model was used. First, we used a standard model that solely uses data on sediment pollution as the input parameter, which is the standard procedure in sediment quality assessments in The Netherlands. The highest intake appeared to be associated with the consumption of contaminated fish and resulted in a health risk for Pb and Zn (hazard index exceeded 1). For the other heavy metals and for benzo(a)pyrene, the total averaged exposure levels were below levels of concern. Secondly, input data for a more location-specific calculation procedure were provided via analyses of samples from sediment, surface water, and suspended matter. When these data (concentrations in surface water) were taken into account, the risk due to consumption of contaminated fish decreased by more than two orders of magnitude and appeared to be negligible. In both exposure assessments, many assumptions were made that contribute to a major degree to the uncertainty of this risk assessment. However, this health risk evaluation is useful as a screening methodology for assessing the urgency of sediment remediation actions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Dec;103 Suppl 9:103-14 - PubMed
    1. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996 Nov;57(5):766-70 - PubMed
    1. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1995 May;28(4):397-405 - PubMed
    1. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1992 Aug;16(1):21-56 - PubMed
    1. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1993 Dec;51(6):873-80 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources