Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
- PMID: 9873218
- DOI: 10.1159/000046302
Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Abstract
Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own clinical experience, this article attempts to present clear guidelines for the management of various kidney stones that will be acceptable to clinical urologists and their patients. Regarding our own patients, we compared different studies and discussed the results concerning the anatomical kidney situation, stone size, stone localization and observation time. Stone-free rates of patients with calyceal diverticula calculi range from 4 to 58%, with an increase after longer follow-up periods. According to the importance of residual fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), we have to distinguish between clinical insignificant residual fragments and clinical significant residual fragments. 24 months following ESWL, stone passage occurs as a continuous process, and if there are no clinical symptoms, any endoscopic procedure should be considered as over-treatment. Newer ESWL technology has increased the percentage of clinically insignificant residual fragments. We consider percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in most of the patients with renal calculi smaller than 30 mm in diameter only as second-line therapy.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update.Eur Urol. 2001 Feb;39(2):187-99. doi: 10.1159/000052435. Eur Urol. 2001. PMID: 11223679 Review.
-
Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22372915
-
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for renal stones >25 mm in children.Urology. 2009 Jul;74(1):109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.083. Epub 2009 May 9. Urology. 2009. PMID: 19428070
-
[Removal of staghorn calculi from the urinary tract with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourologic treatment methods].Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1996 Nov-Dec;124(11-12):323-7. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1996. PMID: 9132970 Serbian.
-
Is there a role for prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for asymptomatic calyceal stones?Curr Opin Urol. 2002 Jul;12(4):281-6. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200207000-00004. Curr Opin Urol. 2002. PMID: 12072647 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(10):961-5. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322010001000006. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010. PMID: 21120294 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Helical CT evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary tract calculi with a discriminant analysis of CT-attenuation values and density.Eur Radiol. 2004 Nov;14(11):2134-40. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2365-6. Epub 2004 Jun 25. Eur Radiol. 2004. PMID: 15221262
-
Alternative management of complex renal stones.Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Sep;43(3):631-8. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9880-y. Epub 2011 Jan 12. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011. PMID: 21225341
-
Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis.Eur Radiol. 2005 Nov;15(11):2238-43. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2742-9. Epub 2005 Apr 2. Eur Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15806362
-
Outcome of shock wave lithotripsy as monotherapy for large solitary renal stones (>2 cm in size) without stenting.Indian J Urol. 2010 Jul;26(3):359-63. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.70568. Indian J Urol. 2010. PMID: 21116354 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources