Tobacco tax initiatives to prevent tobacco use: a study of eight statewide campaigns
- PMID: 9874375
- DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981215)83:12a+<2666::aid-cncr2>3.3.co;2-2
Tobacco tax initiatives to prevent tobacco use: a study of eight statewide campaigns
Abstract
This article reviews the history of successful and unsuccessful tobacco tax initiatives in eight states in the U. S. since 1988. It addresses the common origins of these initiatives and proposes several strategies for the success of citizen-based initiative campaigns attempting to raise the tobacco excise tax. It explores the impact of tobacco tax increases on youth and discusses why youth consumption is increasing even in the face of rising tobacco taxes. Only 50% of the states in the U. S. can pass tobacco tax increases using the initiative process; the other states require legislative action. Four states have succeeded in passing citizen-sponsored tobacco tax initiatives, whereas two others have failed at the ballot. Efforts in two other states foundered when insufficient signatures were submitted to gain a spot on the ballot. Surveys in all six states in which initiatives were placed on the ballot revealed similar high levels of voter support, but the clearest factor separating winning from losing campaigns was the availability of sufficient financial resources. Other important campaign elements included strong leadership, broad coalitions, experienced legal and political consultants, access to public opinion research, and advance planning.
Similar articles
-
Enacting tobacco taxes by direct popular vote in the United States: lessons from 20 years of experience.Tob Control. 2009 Oct;18(5):377-86. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.029843. Epub 2009 Jun 25. Tob Control. 2009. PMID: 19556615 Free PMC article.
-
History of successful ballot initiatives--California.Cancer. 1998 Dec 15;83(12 Suppl Robert):2680-4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981215)83:12a+<2680::aid-cncr3>3.0.co;2-8. Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9874376
-
History of successful ballot initiatives--Massachusetts.Cancer. 1998 Dec 15;83(12 Suppl Robert):2685-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981215)83:12a+<2685::aid-cncr4>3.0.co;2-0. Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9874377
-
[Fiscal policy and tobacco control: a unique opportunity to benefit public health and the public treasury].Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48 Suppl 1:S167-72. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342006000700020. Salud Publica Mex. 2006. PMID: 17684679 Review. Spanish.
-
Mobilising public opinion for the tobacco industry: the Consumer Tax Alliance and excise taxes.Tob Control. 2008 Oct;17(5):351-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.025338. Epub 2008 Aug 7. Tob Control. 2008. PMID: 18687706 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Lack of national primary care organization partnerships with community groups to promote health care reform.Am J Public Health. 2005 May;95(5):832-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.049718. Am J Public Health. 2005. PMID: 15855461 Free PMC article.
-
Enacting tobacco taxes by direct popular vote in the United States: lessons from 20 years of experience.Tob Control. 2009 Oct;18(5):377-86. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.029843. Epub 2009 Jun 25. Tob Control. 2009. PMID: 19556615 Free PMC article.
-
When tobacco targets direct democracy.J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014 Jun;39(3):537-64. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2682603. Epub 2014 Mar 6. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014. PMID: 24603083 Free PMC article.
-
The alcohol industry, the tobacco industry, and excise taxes in the US 1986-89: new insights from the tobacco documents.BMC Public Health. 2022 May 11;22(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13267-w. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35546230 Free PMC article.