Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Oct;80(4):349-54.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.80.4.349.

Comparison of peripheral endothelial dysfunction and intimal media thickness in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Affiliations

Comparison of peripheral endothelial dysfunction and intimal media thickness in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

M D Enderle et al. Heart. 1998 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Flow associated dilatation (FAD%) and intimal media thickness are established markers of early atherosclerosis. This study aimed to compare the ability of the non-invasive measurements FAD% and intimal media thickness to predict coronary artery disease.

Methods: FAD% and intimal media thickness were determined using high resolution ultrasound in 122 patients with clinically suspected coronary artery disease before coronary angiography. Results are given as mean (SD).

Results: Patients with coronary artery disease had reduced FAD% compared with those with angiographically normal coronary vessels (3.7 (4.1) v 7.0 (3.5)%, p < 0.001), whereas intimal media thickness tended to be increased in patients with coronary artery disease (0.58 (0.35) v 0.47 (0.11)mm, p = 0.054). There was a negative correlation between FAD% and intimal media thickness (R = -0.317, p = 0.0004). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that FAD% < or = 4.5% predicted coronary artery disease with a sensitivity of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.80) and a specificity of 0.81 (0.58 to 0.95). In contrast, intimal media thickness showed a positive correlation with the extent of coronary artery disease (number of vessels with a lesion > or = 50%) (R = 0.324, p = 0.0003), without a clear cut off point.

Conclusions: In patients with clinically suspected coronary artery disease, FAD% discriminates between the presence or absence of coronary artery disease, whereas intimal media thickness is associated more with the extent of coronary artery disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow associated vasodilatation (FAD%) related to the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). NCAD, no vessel alterations; CAD-0, vessel alterations but lesion < 50%; CAD-1, lesion > 50% in one vessel; CAD-2, lesion > 50% in two vessels; CAD-3, lesion > 50% in three vessels; FAD%, flow associated (vaso)dilatation derived as percentage change during reactive hyperaemia relative to the baseline scan at rest (100%).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intimal media thickness related to the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). NCAD, no vessel alterations; CAD-0, vessel alterations, but lesion < 50%; CAD-1, lesion > 50% in one vessel; CAD-2, lesion > 50% in two vessels; CAD-3, lesion > 50% in three vessels.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Inverse relation of flow associated vasodilatation (FAD%) and intimal media thickness (R = − 0.317, p = 0.0004, FAD% log transformed). FAD% derived as percentage change during reactive hyperaemia relative to the baseline scan at rest (100%).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis of flow associated vasodilatation (FAD%). Determination of a cut off point of FAD% ⩽ 4.5% as a predictor for coronary artery disease, showing a positive linear relation between intimal media thickness and coronary artery disease (R = 0.324, p = 0.0003). True positive rates (sensitivity) for the different criteria are plotted against false positive rates (1−specificity). FAD% derived as percentage change during reactive hyperaemia relative to the baseline scan at rest (100%).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1965 Nov;95(3):673-83 - PubMed
    1. Ultraschall Med. 1998 Feb;19(1):16-21 - PubMed
    1. Stroke. 1971 Mar-Apr;2(2):160-7 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 31;293(5):211-5 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1980 Nov 27;288(5789):373-6 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms