A comparison of isokinetic strength testing and gait analysis in patients with posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting knee arthroplasties

Abstract

Fourteen patients with a posterior-stabilized prosthesis in one knee and a posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis in the contralateral knee and both scoring good or excellent on the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scale were evaluated by isokinetic muscle testing and comprehensive gait analysis at a mean follow-up of 98 months after arthroplasty. The average HSS knee score (93 points) and the average Knee Society score (94 points) were the same for the cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized knees. No differences were noted between the cruciate-retaining and the posterior stabilized knees with respect to isokinetic muscle testing parameters (peak torque, endurance, angle of peak torque, and torque acceleration energy) for both quadriceps and hamstrings. No significant differences were found between the cruciate-retaining and the posterior-stabilized knees with regard to gait parameters, knee range of motion, and electromyographic waveforms during level walking and stair climbing. Cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses perform equally well during level gait and stair climbing.