[Prognostic factors and etiology in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia admitted at the ICU. Spanish multicenter study. Study Group on Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Spain]
- PMID: 9881346
[Prognostic factors and etiology in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia admitted at the ICU. Spanish multicenter study. Study Group on Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Spain]
Abstract
Objective: To determine the techniques used for the etiological diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to describe the predominant causative organisms as well as prognostic factors of ICU mortality.
Patients and methods: A total of 262 patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to 26 ICUs between 1 November of 1991 and 31 October of 1992 were included in a prospective, open, multicenter study.
Results: The diagnostic techniques most frequently used were blood culture (243 cases) and simple tracheal aspirate (166 cases). Simple tracheal aspirate (58.4%), bronchoalveolar lavage (47.7%), and protected-specimen brush (44.2%) were the techniques that showed the highest diagnostic reliability. In 220 cases, techniques considered of high diagnostic probability were employed. With the use of these procedures, the most frequent causative pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (13.6%) and Legionella pneumophila (9.5%). In 100 cases (45.5%), no pathogen was isolated. A total of 88 patients (33.6%) died during the ICU stay. Predictive variables of poor outcome selected by means of a multivariate analysis were as follows: multisystemic failure (OR = 28.6; 95% CI: 12.8-65.1; p = 0.0001), APACHE II at the time of ICU admission (OR = 5.3; 95% CI: 2.5-11.3; p = 0.0001), progression and/or spread of lung infection (OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 2.4-8.4; p = 0.0001), and shock on admission (OR = 8.48; 95% CI: 4.5-15.9; p = 0.0001).
Conclusions: In 45.5% of patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to ICU, no causative pathogen was identified. The prognosis of these patients was influenced by the severity of disease assessed by APACHE II score and presence of multisystemic failure and shock at the time of ICU admission.
Comment in
-
[Severe community-acquired pneumonia].Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Mar 20;112(10):378-9. Med Clin (Barc). 1999. PMID: 10227019 Spanish. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Severe community acquired pneumonia: a one-year analysis in a tertiary referral intensive care unit.N Z Med J. 2000 May 12;113(1109):161-4. N Z Med J. 2000. PMID: 10894342
-
PIRO score for community-acquired pneumonia: a new prediction rule for assessment of severity in intensive care unit patients with community-acquired pneumonia.Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):456-62. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318194b021. Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19114916
-
Severe community-acquired pneumonia: an Australian perspective.Intern Med J. 2005 Dec;35(12):699-705. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00962.x. Intern Med J. 2005. PMID: 16313544
-
[Community-acquired pneumonia due to Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. Study of 97 cases].Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2003 Oct;21(8):394-400. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2003. PMID: 14525703 Review. Spanish.
-
Assessment of severity of community-acquired pneumonia.Semin Respir Infect. 1999 Jun;14(2):103-14. Semin Respir Infect. 1999. PMID: 10391405 Review.
Cited by
-
[Guidelines for the management of community pneumonia in adult who needs hospitalization].Med Intensiva. 2005 Feb;29(1):21-62. doi: 10.1016/S0210-5691(05)74199-1. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Med Intensiva. 2005. PMID: 38620135 Free PMC article. Spanish.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources