Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Dec;16(12 Pt 2):2079-84.
doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816121-00033.

Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis

I B Wilkinson et al. J Hypertens. 1998 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility of pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) measured using pulse wave analysis (PWA), prior to its use in large-scale clinical trials.

Methods: Arterial pressure waveforms were recorded and analysed using an established technique (Sphygmocor). Subjects with and without a range of recognized cardiovascular risk factors were studied to provide a wide range of values. Measurements were made after a brief introduction to the technique in a clinical setting. Two observers recorded aortic and brachial PWV in 24 subjects, each on two occasions, in a random order. In a separate study, two different observers used PWA to determine AIx in 33 subjects, each on two occasions, in a random order. Data were analysed using Bland-Altman plots and presented as mean +/- SD.

Results: Brachial PWV was 8.65+/-1.58 m/s (range 6.16-10.95 m/s) and aortic PWV was 8.15+/-3.01 m/s (5.01-17.97 m/s). Within-observer variability was 0.14+/-0.82 m/s for brachial PWV and 0.07+/-1.17 m/s for aortic PWV. Corresponding between-observer values were -0.44+/-1.09 m/s and -0.30+/-1.25 m/s. AIx ranged from -15.0 to +45.0%, with a group mean of +19.6+/-12.0%. The within-observer difference was 0.49+/-5.37% and between-observer difference 0.23+/-3.80%.

Conclusion: PWA is a simple and reproducible technique with which to measure PWV and AIx. Reproducibility accords with that reported by other workers using different methodologies. PWA may, therefore, be suitable for large-scale population and intervention studies investigating the clinical relevance of vascular stiffness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources