Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998;17(6):511-4.
doi: 10.1007/BF01451289.

Sensitivity of lateral view cervical spine radiographs taken in the neutral position in atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatic diseases

Affiliations

Sensitivity of lateral view cervical spine radiographs taken in the neutral position in atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatic diseases

M Kauppi et al. Clin Rheumatol. 1998.

Abstract

The value of lateral view cervical spine radiography in various positions of the neck was assessed in patients with rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS). We wanted to find out how much information is lost if only neutral position radiographs are used. The series consisted of 65 rheumatoid patients with unstable AAS. Lateral view cervical spine radiographs were taken in the neutral position and during flexion and extension. Neutral position radiographs would have failed to confirm the diagnosis of AAS in 31 cases (48%) and would have failed to record its true severity in 43 cases (66%); their diagnostic sensitivity was 52%. The sensitivity of the neutral radiographs in showing the reversibility of AAS was 48%. Routine cervical spine radiography of rheumatoid patients should include lateral view radiographs taken during flexion and extension. The result may be applied to magnetic resonance imaging, which is usually performed in the neutral position.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Rheumatol. 1991 Dec;18(12 ):1804-9 - PubMed
    1. Orthopedics. 1991 Sep;14(9):969-73; discussion 973-4 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 1990 Feb;17 (2):167-72 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 May;32(5):652-9 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Apr 18;294(6578):988-9 - PubMed