Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment
- PMID: 9891397
- PMCID: PMC1284151
- DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment
Abstract
We evaluated the utility of a brief (5-min) stimulus preference assessment for individuals with developmental disabilities. Participants had noncontingent (free) access to an array of stimuli and could interact with any of the stimuli at any time. Stimuli were never withdrawn or withheld from the participants during a 5-min session. In Experiment 1, the brief preference assessment was conducted for 10 participants to identify differentially preferred stimuli, and reinforcer assessments were conducted to test the reinforcing efficacy of those stimuli identified as highly preferred. In Experiment 2, a comparison was conducted between the brief preference assessment and a commonly used paired-stimulus preference assessment. Collectively, results demonstrated that the brief preference assessment identified stimuli that functioned as reinforcers for a simple operant response, identified preferred stimuli that were differentially effective as reinforcers compared to nonpreferred stimuli, was associated with fewer problem behaviors, and required less time to complete than a commonly used paired-stimulus preference assessment.
Similar articles
-
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26. Res Dev Disabil. 2009. PMID: 19327964
-
An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706. Dev Neurorehabil. 2010. PMID: 20629593
-
An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 9. Res Dev Disabil. 2008. PMID: 17097267
-
Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.Behav Modif. 2004 Sep;28(5):668-77. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259836. Behav Modif. 2004. PMID: 15296524 Review.
-
Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature.Res Dev Disabil. 2005 Jan-Feb;26(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.01.006. Res Dev Disabil. 2005. PMID: 15590233 Review.
Cited by
-
Increasing passive compliance to wearing a facemask in children with autism spectrum disorder.J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Apr;54(2):582-599. doi: 10.1002/jaba.829. Epub 2021 Mar 19. J Appl Behav Anal. 2021. PMID: 33740281 Free PMC article.
-
A Survey of Why and How Clinicians Change Reinforcers during Teaching Sessions.Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Aug 29;17(3):815-830. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00847-4. eCollection 2024 Sep. Behav Anal Pract. 2023. PMID: 39391193 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating preschool children's preferences for motivational systems during instruction.J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):249-61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.59-05. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007. PMID: 17624066 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):353-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-353. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000. PMID: 11051581 Free PMC article.
-
Toward an empirical method for identifying matched stimulation for automatically reinforced behavior: a preliminary investigation.J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Spring;39(1):137-40. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.37-05. J Appl Behav Anal. 2006. PMID: 16602394 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources