Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998;9(6):397-404.
doi: 10.1007/BF02199575.

Do bladder neck mobility and urethral sphincter function differ during pregnancy compared with during the non-pregnant state?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Do bladder neck mobility and urethral sphincter function differ during pregnancy compared with during the non-pregnant state?

S Meyer et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess and compare urethral sphincter (US) function and bladder neck (BN) behavior in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Urethral pressure profile parameters, intravaginal-anal pressures and BN position/mobility were compared in both pregnant and non-pregnant women. It was found that pregnancy results in a decreased maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP)/area of continence at rest and at stress, decreased pressure-transmission ratio (PTR) values and backwards displacement of the bladder neck. No significant changes in intravaginal-anal pressures and BN mobility/downwards displacement were seen. Compared with stress continent pregnant patients, pregnant patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have a lower MUCP at rest/stress and area of continence at stress, but show no difference in BN behavior. Regression analysis shows no correlation between advancing pregnancy and any of these parameters. It was concluded that pregnancy induces diminished US function and backwards displacement of the BN. Compared to continent pregnant patients, pregnant women with SUI also have a diminished US function. US parameters are not significantly modified by advancing pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980 Oct;87(10):897-900 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):69-73 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Dec;98(12):1283-6 - PubMed
    1. World J Urol. 1996;14(6):388-92 - PubMed
    1. Br J Urol. 1997 Jul;80 Suppl 1:14-23 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources