Risk of venous thrombosis with use of current low-dose oral contraceptives is not explained by diagnostic suspicion and referral bias
- PMID: 9892332
- DOI: 10.1001/archinte.159.1.65
Risk of venous thrombosis with use of current low-dose oral contraceptives is not explained by diagnostic suspicion and referral bias
Abstract
Background: The magnitude of the relative risk of venous thrombosis caused by low-dose oral contraceptive use is still debated because previous studies might have been affected by diagnostic suspicion and referral bias.
Methods: We conducted a case-control study in which the effect of diagnostic suspicion and referral bias was excluded. The study was performed in 2 diagnostic centers to which patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis of the leg were referred. History of oral contraceptive use was obtained before objective testing for thrombosis. Young females with an objective diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis were considered case patients, and those who were referred with the same clinical suspicion but who had no thrombosis served as control subjects. Participants were seen between September 1, 1982, and October 18, 1995: 185 consecutive patients and 591 controls aged 15 to 49 years with a first episode of venous thrombosis and without malignant neoplasms, pregnancy, or known inherited clotting defects.
Results: The overall odds ratio for oral contraceptive use was 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-4.5); after adjustment for age, family history of venous thrombosis, calendar time, and center, the odds ratio was 3.9 (95% CI, 2.6-5.7). In the idiopathic group (120 patients and 413 controls, excluding recent surgery, trauma, or immobilization), the odds ratio for oral contraceptive use was 3.8 (95% CI, 2.5-5.9); after adjustment, the odds ratio was 5.0 (95% CI, 3.1-8.2).
Conclusions: In this study, in which patients and controls were subj ect to the same referral and diagnostic procedures, we found similar relative risk estimates for oral contraceptive use as in previous studies. We conclude that diagnostic suspicion and referral bias did not play an important role in previous studies and that the risk of venous thrombosis with use of current brands of oral contraceptives still exists.
Comment in
-
Lack of objectivity in the debate concerning third-generation oral contraceptives and venous thrombosis.Arch Intern Med. 2001 Feb 12;161(3):484-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.3.484. Arch Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11176782 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Estimates of risk of venous thrombosis during pregnancy and puerperium are not influenced by diagnostic suspicion and referral basis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;191(3):825-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15467549
-
Venous thromboembolism and oral contraceptive use: a methodological study of diagnostic suspicion and referral bias.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000 Sep;5(3):183-91. doi: 10.1080/13625180008500392. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000. PMID: 11131783
-
Population-based study of risk of venous thromboembolism associated with various oral contraceptives.Lancet. 1997 Jan 11;349(9045):83-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07496-x. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 8996419
-
The epidemiology of oral contraceptive use: a critical review of the studies on oral contraceptives and the health of young women.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct;179(4):1086-97. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70220-0. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. PMID: 9790403 Review.
-
Venous and arterial thrombosis during oral contraceptive use: risks and risk factors.Semin Vasc Med. 2003 Feb;3(1):69-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38334. Semin Vasc Med. 2003. PMID: 15199494 Review.
Cited by
-
The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study.BMJ. 2009 Aug 13;339:b2921. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2921. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19679614 Free PMC article.
-
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297. PLoS Med. 2007. PMID: 17941715 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Benefits and risks of third-generation oral contraceptives.J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Oct;14(10):625-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.08108.x. J Gen Intern Med. 1999. PMID: 10571709 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gam-COVID-Vac, EpiVacCorona, and CoviVac effectiveness against lung injury during Delta and Omicron variant surges in St. Petersburg, Russia: a test-negative case-control study.Respir Res. 2022 Oct 10;23(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02206-3. Respir Res. 2022. PMID: 36217139 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The case-only design is a powerful approach to detect interactions but should be used with caution.BMC Genomics. 2025 Mar 6;26(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11318-1. BMC Genomics. 2025. PMID: 40050722 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical