Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jan 19;96(2):640-5.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.640.

Generation of native bovine mAbs by phage display

Affiliations

Generation of native bovine mAbs by phage display

P M O'Brien et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Modeling of disease pathogenesis and immunity often is carried out in large animals that are natural targets for pathogens of human or economic relevance. Although murine mAbs are a valuable tool in identifying certain host/pathogen interactions, progress in comparative immunology would be enhanced by the use of mAbs isolated from the host species. Such antibodies would reflect an authentic host immune response to infection or vaccination, and as they are host derived, would allow the application of in vivo experiments that previously have been unrealizable in large animals because of induction of an antispecies immune response. The advent of antibody phage display technology provides a way of producing host-derived mAbs in animals where the molecular genetics of Ig formation are known. Exploiting recent advances in the molecular immunology of cattle, we report here the design of an optimized phage display vector, pComBov, for the construction of combinatorial libraries of bovine Ig antigen-binding fragments (Fab) of native sequence. By using this system, we initially have generated and characterized a panel of bovine mAbs against a model antigen glutathione S-transferase. The isolated mAbs showed features typical of bovine Igs and recognized glutathione S-transferase with high specificity in ELISA and by Western blotting. The pComBov expression system can be readily adapted for the preparation of libraries from related ruminant species and advances the use of monoclonal reagents derived in this way for comparative studies in animals of economic importance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Oligonucleotide primers used in expression vector and library construction. Primer sequences are written 5′ to 3′. Restriction endonuclease recognition sites are underlined. Degenerate nucleotides are indicated as follows: S = C or G; W = A or T; M = A or C; Y = C or T.
Figure 2
Figure 2
pComBov expression cassette. Modified from pComb3H phagemid (19) on a pBluescript background (23). The CL was cloned from bovine genomic DNA. Digestion with SpeI and NheI removes the geneIII sequence, allowing expression of soluble Fab. Arrows indicate the position of cleavage of secretory sequences (pelB or ompA) during periplasmic expression of Fab. Amino acid resides (single-letter code) immediately after the cleavage site are the optimized bovine amino-terminal Ig sequences. RBS, ribosome binding site.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Alignment of predicted amino acid sequences for the selected anti-GST clones. The nucleotide sequences of the VH and VL inserts of eight dominant and three minority clones were determined and translated into protein sequence (single-letter code). Unique VL (iiii) and VH (iiv) are shown for the dominant clones. Each minority clone expressed unique VL and VH sequence patterns. The sequences are segregated into CDR and FR regions based on homology to known bovine sequences (–18). A dash (–) indicates identity to the uppermost sequence; ∗ indicates no amino acid at this position. (B) VL and VH chain usage in the dominant selected anti-GST clones. Three VL (iiii) and four VH (iiv) sequences were found in various combinations in the eight dominant clones. Clones G67, G72, G74, and G76 expressed the same VL and VH combination and are therefore identical. Clone G63 differs by only two VH FR residues from clone G77.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Antigen specificity of anti-GST Fab. (A) ELISA. Fab supernatants were diluted 1:2 and tested for reactivity against a range of protein antigens. Optical densities were read at 630 nm after 15 min; data are results from one of three similar experiments. Reactivity against GST is indicated in bold. WT, pComBov (no VH or VL sequences); HEL, hen egg lysozyme; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate-BSA conjugate; OVA, chicken ovalbumin; NO, no coating antigen. (B) Western blot GST and BSA were separated by SDS/PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose, then incubated with supernatants containing anti-GST Fab. Fab recognized GST (26 kDa) but not BSA (not shown). WT, as in A; POS, positive control anti-GST mouse mAb; NEG, anti-bovine Ig-horseradish peroxidase only; MW, molecular weight (kDa).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kohler G, Milstein C. Nature (London) 1975;25:495–497. - PubMed
    1. Cole S P, Campling B G, Atlaw T, Kozbor D, Roder J D. Mol Cell Biochem. 1984;62:109–120. - PubMed
    1. Groves D J, Tucker E M. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1989;23:1–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suter M. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1992;33:285–300. - PubMed
    1. Burton D R, Barbas C F., III Adv Immunol. 1994;57:191–280. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources