Intercessory Prayer for ill Health: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 9892835
- DOI: 10.1159/000057115
Intercessory Prayer for ill Health: A Systematic Review
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To review the effectiveness of prayer as an additional intervention for those with health problems already receiving standard medical care. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic Searches of Biological Abstracts, CINAHL, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EM-BASE, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, and Sociofile were undertaken. All references of articles selected were searched for further relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of personal, focused, committed and organised intercessory prayer on behalf of anyone with a health problem were considered. Outcomes such as achievement of desired goals, death, illness, quality of life and well-being for the recipients of prayer, those praying and the caregivers were sought. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were reliably selected and assessed for methodological quality. Data were extracted by 4 reviewers working independently. Dichotomous data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, and continuous data with over 50% completion rate are presented. MAIN RESULTS: There was no evidence that prayer affected the numbers of people dying from leukaemia or heart disease (OR 0.64, CI 0.32-1.27), or that it decreased coronary care complications (OR 1.05, CI 0.49-2.26) or the time participants stayed in hospital. There were significantly fewer 'intermediat//poor outcomes' for those with heart disease in the prayed-for group (OR 0.49, CI 0.30-0.80), and this finding was robust to some changes in definition. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides no guidance for those wishing to uphold or refute the effect of intercessory prayer on the outcomes studied in the available trials. Therefore, in the light of the best available data, there are no grounds to change current practices. There are very few completed trials of the value of intercessory prayer. The evidence presented so far is interesting enough to justify further study. If prayer is seen as a human endeavour it may or may not be beneficial, and further trials could uncover this. It could be the case that any effects are due to elements beyond present scientific understanding that will, in time, be understood. If any benefit derives from God's response to prayer it may be beyond any such trials to prove or disprove.
Similar articles
-
A randomized, controlled trial of the effects of remote, intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients admitted to the coronary care unit.Arch Intern Med. 1999 Oct 25;159(19):2273-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.19.2273. Arch Intern Med. 1999. PMID: 10547166 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes of Intercessory Prayer for those who are Ill: Scientific and Pastoral Perspectives.Linacre Q. 2011 May;78(2):125-137. doi: 10.1179/002436311803888384. Epub 2011 May 1. Linacre Q. 2011. PMID: 30082936 Free PMC article.
-
Intercessory prayer and cardiovascular disease progression in a coronary care unit population: a randomized controlled trial.Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 Dec;76(12):1192-8. doi: 10.4065/76.12.1192. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001. PMID: 11761499 Clinical Trial.
-
Personal prayer in patients dealing with chronic illness: a review of the research literature.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:927973. doi: 10.1155/2015/927973. Epub 2015 Feb 26. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015. PMID: 25815041 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Just another drug? A philosophical assessment of randomised controlled studies on intercessory prayer.J Med Ethics. 2006 Aug;32(8):487-90. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013672. J Med Ethics. 2006. PMID: 16877631 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Miracles and the limits of medical knowledge.Med Health Care Philos. 2002;5(1):1-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1014275232713. Med Health Care Philos. 2002. PMID: 11954989
-
Compromised ethical principles in randomised clinical trials of distant, intercessory prayer.J Bioeth Inq. 2005;2(3):142-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02448595. J Bioeth Inq. 2005. PMID: 16578941