APACHE II, data accuracy and outcome prediction
- PMID: 9893535
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00534.x
APACHE II, data accuracy and outcome prediction
Abstract
From review of 122 intensive care charts, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II points were determined for eight physiological values. Using a strict interpretation of APACHE II criteria, an average of 20.6% of these points were higher and 6.7% lower than the points entered originally into an intensive care database. The resulting 1.73 points mean increase in APACHE II score increased predicted mortality from 24.8% to 27.8% and decreased the mortality ratio (observed hospital deaths devided by predicted deaths) from 1.52 (95% confidence interval: 1.11-2.03) to 1.35 (95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.81). There were few errors entering the data recorded on the audit form into the intensive care unit database with an optical mark reader and keyboard. Inaccuracy and inconsistency in data collection must be excluded before differences in mortality ratios are ascribed to intensive care unit performance.
Similar articles
-
Reliability of intensive care unit admitting and comorbid diagnoses, race, elements of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and predicted probability of mortality in an electronic intensive care unit database.J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;24(3):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jul 3. J Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 19577415
-
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82. Indian J Med Res. 2004. PMID: 15243165
-
Accuracy and reliability of APACHE II scoring in two intensive care units Problems and pitfalls in the use of APACHE II and suggestions for improvement.Anaesthesia. 2001 Jan;56(1):47-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01763.x. Anaesthesia. 2001. PMID: 11167435
-
Severity scores in respiratory intensive care: APACHE II predicted mortality better than SAPS II.Respir Care. 1995 Oct;40(10):1042-7. Respir Care. 1995. PMID: 10152703 Review.
-
What if your hospital informatics department could provide a severity adjuster?Crit Care Med. 2000 Oct;28(10):3570-1. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200010000-00045. Crit Care Med. 2000. PMID: 11057824 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
The influence of missing components of the Acute Physiology Score of APACHE III on the measurement of ICU performance.Intensive Care Med. 2005 Nov;31(11):1537-43. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2751-9. Epub 2005 Oct 5. Intensive Care Med. 2005. PMID: 16205890
-
A nationwide survey of intensive care unit discharge practices.Intensive Care Med. 2005 Dec;31(12):1676-82. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2831-x. Epub 2005 Oct 26. Intensive Care Med. 2005. PMID: 16249927
-
Assessment of performance of four mortality prediction systems in a Saudi Arabian intensive care unit.Crit Care. 2002 Apr;6(2):166-74. doi: 10.1186/cc1477. Epub 2002 Mar 13. Crit Care. 2002. PMID: 11983044 Free PMC article.
-
Role of arterial blood glucose and interstitial fluid glucose difference in evaluating microcirculation and clinical prognosis of patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study.BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):910. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09768-1. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 39227759 Free PMC article.
-
Critical Care Nurses Inadequately Assess SAPS II Scores of Very Ill Patients in Real Life.Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:919106. doi: 10.1155/2012/919106. Epub 2012 Apr 2. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012. PMID: 22548157 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources