Developers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications. The Science Panel on Interactive Communications and Health
- PMID: 9894552
- DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00106-8
Developers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications. The Science Panel on Interactive Communications and Health
Abstract
Background: Developers of Interactive Health Communication (IHC) are capable of providing great benefit by creating interactive programs that serve to protect and improve health. Conducting proper evaluation of these programs will ensure that they achieve these goals more successfully.
Conclusions: This article seeks to inform developers of IHC about which types of evaluation are most important to include as a part of the development process and to examine the ways in which such evaluation can be implemented to benefit the producers--and ultimately, the consumers--of IHC.
Similar articles
-
Health care providers and purchasers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00105-6. Am J Prev Med. 1999. PMID: 9894550
-
Policy issues relevant to evaluation of interactive health communication applications. The Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):35-42. Am J Prev Med. 1999. PMID: 9894553
-
Consumers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications. The Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00104-4. Am J Prev Med. 1999. PMID: 9894551 No abstract available.
-
An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.JAMA. 1998 Oct 14;280(14):1264-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.14.1264. JAMA. 1998. PMID: 9786378 Review.
-
[IT standards for applications in telemedicine. Towards efficient data interchange in medicine].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2009 Mar;52(3):316-23. doi: 10.1007/s00103-009-0788-6. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2009. PMID: 19255733 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Design and evaluation in eHealth: challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field.J Med Internet Res. 2007 May 27;9(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e15. J Med Internet Res. 2007. PMID: 17537718 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):707-13. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005546. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010. PMID: 20962135 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced practice registered nurse usability testing of a tailored computer-mediated health communication program.Comput Inform Nurs. 2010 Jan-Feb;28(1):32-41. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181c0484e. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010. PMID: 19940619 Free PMC article.
-
Usability testing by older adults of a computer-mediated health communication program.J Health Commun. 2009 Mar;14(2):102-18. doi: 10.1080/10810730802659095. J Health Commun. 2009. PMID: 19283536 Free PMC article.
-
User acceptance of HIV TIDES--Tailored Interventions for Management of Depressive Symptoms in persons living with HIV/AIDS.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):217-26. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2481. Epub 2007 Dec 20. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008. PMID: 18096915 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources