This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 1999 Jan 23;318(7178):263-4.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7178.263.

Randomised block design is more powerful than minimisation

N Ross

PMID: 9915749
PMCID: PMC1114739
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7178.263

Comment

Randomised block design is more powerful than minimisation

N Ross. BMJ. 1999.

. 1999 Jan 23;318(7178):263-4.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7178.263.

Author

N Ross

PMID: 9915749
PMCID: PMC1114739
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7178.263

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Minimisation is much better than the randomised block design in certain cases.
Treasure T, MacRae KD. Treasure T, et al. BMJ. 1999 May 22;318(7195):1420. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1420. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10334768 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Comment on

Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials?. Randomisation doesn't guarantee similarity of groups; minimisation does.
Treasure T, MacRae KD. Treasure T, et al. BMJ. 1998 Aug 8;317(7155):362-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.362. BMJ. 1998. PMID: 9694748 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

1. Treasure T, MacRae KD. Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials? BMJ. 1998;317:362–363. . (8 August.) - PMC - PubMed
1. Zar JC. Biostatistical analysis. London: Prentice-Hall; 1996.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources