Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Feb;67(2):520-6.
doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.2.520-526.1999.

Receptor-dependent immune responses in pigs after oral immunization with F4 fimbriae

Affiliations

Receptor-dependent immune responses in pigs after oral immunization with F4 fimbriae

W Van den Broeck et al. Infect Immun. 1999 Feb.

Abstract

F4 receptor-positive (F4R+) and F4 receptor-negative (F4R-) pigs were orally vaccinated with purified F4 fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA responses were readily detected in F4R+ animals, whereas immune responses were not detected in F4R- animals. Even after a subsequent oral infection with virulent F4(+) ETEC and a booster immunization with F4, the F4R- animals remained F4 seronegative whereas the unvaccinated F4R+ pigs exhibited clear IgA and IgG responses. These results clearly demonstrate that F4Rs are a prerequisite for an immune response following oral immunization. Furthermore, indications that oral F4 vaccination can induce mucosal protection were obtained, since the experimental ETEC infection did not induce a systemic booster response or fecal ETEC excretion in orally vaccinated F4R+ pigs, in contrast to the clear immune response and ETEC excretion of unvaccinated F4R+ animals. F4-specific IgA antibodies could be found in the feces of the vaccinated F4R+ pigs. They are secreted at the intestinal mucosal surface and appear to prevent ETEC infection. The F4R-dependent induction of a mucosal immune response can be used as a model to better understand mucosal immunization and mucosal immune responses and can contribute to the development of oral vaccines in veterinary as well as in human medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Small intestinal villous brush borders after the in vitro adhesion assay with F4ac+ E. coli. (A) F4R+ brush border with strong adhesion; (B) F4R brush border without adhesion. Bars, 10 μm.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Adhesion of F4+ ETEC to F4R+ intestinal villi (of two pigs) with and without addition of 10 μg of F4ac- and swine IgG-specific MAb per ml (A) and adhesion of ETEC grown at 37 or 18°C to F4R+ intestinal villi (of two pigs) (B). Bars and T bars represent mean numbers of adhering bacteria per 250-μm length of villous brush border ± SEM (n = 2).
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
Adhesion of F4+ ETEC to intestinal villi of control pigs (n = 5) and vaccinated pigs (n = 10). The adhesion assay was repeated twice for each pig. Bars and T bars represent mean numbers of adhering bacteria per 250-μm length of villous brush border for individual pigs ± SEM (n = 3).
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
Adhesion of F4+ ETEC to intestinal villi of pigs in the CF4R+ group (n = 5), the VF4R+ group (n = 4), and the VF4R group (n = 6). Bars and T bars represent mean numbers of adhering bacteria per 250-μm length of villous brush border ± SEM.
FIG. 5
FIG. 5
Evolution of the F4-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody titers in serum (±SEM) in CF4R+ animals (n = 5), in VF4R+ animals (n = 4), and in VF4R animals (n = 6) following vaccination on days 0 and 16; all animals were challenged on day 36, and F4-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies in serum were quantified. prim. vacc., primary vaccination; sec. vacc., secondary vaccination.
FIG. 6
FIG. 6
Mean F4-specific IgA titers in feces of VF4R+ pigs (n = 4), VF4R pigs (n = 6), and CF4R+ pigs (n = 5) 35 days ppv (1 day before oral ETEC challenge). Bars and T bars represent mean titers ± SEM.
FIG. 7
FIG. 7
Evolution of the F4-specific IgA titers (±SEM) in feces of VF4R+ pigs (n = 4), VF4R pigs (n = 6), and CF4R+ pigs (n = 5) following oral ETEC challenge.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Argenzio R A, Moon H W, Kemeny L J, Whipp S C. Colonic compensation in transmissible gastroenteritis of swine. Gastroenterology. 1984;86:1501–1509. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnouts S. Ph.D. thesis. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University Leuven; 1994. Somatostatin immunoneutralization in the chicken: immunogen development and effect on growth; p. 42.
    1. Bakker D, Willemsen P T, Simons L H, van Zijderveld F G, de Graaf F K. Characterization of the antigenic and adhesive properties of FaeG, the major subunit of K88 fimbriae. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:247–255. - PubMed
    1. Bertschinger H U, Stamm M, Vögeli P. Inheritance of resistance to oedema disease in the pig: experiments with an Escherichia coli strain expressing fimbriae 107. Vet Microbiol. 1993;35:79–89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clements J D, Hartzog N M, Lyon F L. Adjuvant activity of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin and effect on the induction of oral tolerance in mice to unrelated protein antigens. Vaccine. 1988;6:269–277. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources