Do "America's Best Hospitals" perform better for acute myocardial infarction?
- PMID: 9920954
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199901283400407
Do "America's Best Hospitals" perform better for acute myocardial infarction?
Abstract
Background: "America's Best Hospitals," an influential list published annually by U.S. News and World Report, assesses the quality of hospitals. It is not known whether patients admitted to hospitals ranked at the top in cardiology have lower short-term mortality from acute myocardial infarction than those admitted to other hospitals or whether differences in mortality are explained by differential use of recommended therapies.
Methods: Using data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project on 149,177 elderly Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction in 1994 or 1995, we examined the care and outcomes of patients admitted to three types of hospitals: those ranked high in cardiology (top-ranked hospitals); hospitals not in the top rank that had on-site facilities for cardiac catheterization, coronary angioplasty, and bypass surgery (similarly equipped hospitals); and the remaining hospitals (non-similarly equipped hospitals). We compared 30-day mortality; the rates of use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and reperfusion; and the relation of differences in rates of therapy to short-term mortality.
Results: Admission to a top-ranked hospital was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.87; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 1.00; P=0.05 for top-ranked hospitals vs. the others). Among patients without contraindications to therapy, top-ranked hospitals had significantly higher rates of use of aspirin (96.2 percent, as compared with 88.6 percent for similarly equipped hospitals and 83.4 percent for non-similarly equipped hospitals; P<0.01) and beta-blockers (75.0 percent vs. 61.8 percent and 58.7 percent, P<0.01), but lower rates of reperfusion therapy (61.0 percent vs. 70.7 percent and 65.6 percent, P=0.03). The survival advantage associated with admission to top-ranked hospitals was less strong after we adjusted for factors including the use of aspirin and beta-blockers (odds ratio, 0.94; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.08; P=0.38).
Conclusions: Admission to a hospital ranked high on the list of "America's Best Hospitals" was associated with lower 30-day mortality among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. A substantial portion of the survival advantage may be associated with these hospitals' higher rates of use of aspirin and beta-blocker therapy.
Comment in
-
Hospitals, heal yourselves.N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 28;340(4):309-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901283400410. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 9920957 No abstract available.
-
Comparing hospitals.N Engl J Med. 1999 Jun 24;340(25):2006-7; author reply 2007. doi: 10.1056/nejm199906243402518. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 10383285 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators.N Engl J Med. 2000 May 25;342(21):1573-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005253422106. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10824077
-
"America's Best Hospitals" in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 9;167(13):1345-51. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1345. Arch Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17620526
-
Does physician specialty affect the survival of elderly patients with myocardial infarction?Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 2):1093-116. Health Serv Res. 2000. PMID: 11130812 Free PMC article.
-
Indicators of quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction.CMAJ. 2008 Oct 21;179(9):909-15. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080749. CMAJ. 2008. PMID: 18936456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Letter by Gale et al regarding article, "which hospitals have significantly better or worse than expected mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction patients? Improved risk adjustment with present-at-admission diagnoses".Circulation. 2008 Jul 1;118(1):e9; author reply e10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.767897. Circulation. 2008. PMID: 18591446 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Prediction of hospital acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30-day mortality rates using publicly reported performance measures.J Healthc Qual. 2013 Mar-Apr;35(2):15-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00173.x. Epub 2011 Nov 11. J Healthc Qual. 2013. PMID: 22093186 Free PMC article.
-
On "risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: are APR-DRGs the right tool?".Health Serv Res. 2000 Mar;34(7):1491-5; discussion 1495-8. Health Serv Res. 2000. PMID: 10737449 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Resident utilization of information technology.J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Dec;16(12):838-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.10239.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11903763 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Do the leading children's hospitals have quality web sites? A description of children's hospital web sites.J Med Internet Res. 2004 Jun 25;6(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.2.e20. J Med Internet Res. 2004. PMID: 15249269 Free PMC article.
-
Quality markers in cardiology: measures of outcomes and clinical practice--a perspective of the Spanish Society of Cardiology and of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 1;37(1):12-23. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv527. Epub 2015 Oct 21. Eur Heart J. 2016. PMID: 26491106 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical