SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK: an international randomized trial of emergency PTCA/CABG-trial design. The SHOCK Trial Study Group
- PMID: 9924166
- DOI: 10.1053/hj.1999.v137.95352
SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK: an international randomized trial of emergency PTCA/CABG-trial design. The SHOCK Trial Study Group
Abstract
Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Nonrandomized studies suggest reduced mortality rate with revascularization.
Trial design: The SHOCK trial is a multicenter, randomized, and unblinded study with a Registry for trial-eligible and ineligible nonrandomized patients. The trial is testing the hypothesis that a direct invasive strategy of emergency revascularization for patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute MI will reduce 30-day all-cause mortality rate by 20 absolute percentage points compared with initial medical stabilization. Eligibility criteria include development of CS within 36 hours of an acute transmural MI as evidenced by ST elevation or new left bundle branch block MI; clinical criteria for CS with hemodynamic confirmation; absence of a mechanical, iatrogenic, or other cause of shock; and enrollment within 12 hours of CS diagnosis. Patients randomly assigned to emergency revascularization immediately undergo coronary angiography, with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting depending on the coronary anatomy. Patients assigned to initial medical stabilization may undergo revascularization >/=54 hours after randomization.
End points: The primary end point is all-cause 30-day mortality after randomization. Secondary end points include death at trial termination, changes in left ventricular dimensions and function measured by echocardiography at randomization and 2 weeks later, and changes in quality of life and physical functioning from 2 weeks after discharge to 6 months after MI.
Similar articles
-
Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):625-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 10460813 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3 Suppl A):1063-70. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00879-2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10985706 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial.Circulation. 2005 Sep 27;112(13):1992-2001. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.540948. Circulation. 2005. PMID: 16186436 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiogenic shock: a summary of the randomized SHOCK trial.Congest Heart Fail. 2003 Jan-Feb;9(1):35-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2003.tb00020.x. Congest Heart Fail. 2003. PMID: 12556676 Review.
-
Cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction and outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention.Acute Card Care. 2008;10(3):131-43. doi: 10.1080/17482940801983006. Acute Card Care. 2008. PMID: 18972627 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcome after surgery and percutaneous intervention for cardiogenic shock and left main disease.Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jul;86(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.019. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18573394 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid complete reversal of systemic hypoperfusion after intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation and survival in cardiogenic shock complicating an acute myocardial infarction.Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.04.025. Am Heart J. 2011. PMID: 21835287 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiogenic shock without flow-limiting angiographic coronary artery disease: (from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronary Arteries for Cardiogenic Shock Trial and Registry).Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jul 1;104(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 May 4. Am J Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19576316 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.J Clin Med. 2022 May 31;11(11):3116. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113116. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35683500 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation and management of patients with coronary chronic total occlusions considered for revascularisation. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the ESC, and the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery.EuroIntervention. 2024 Feb 5;20(3):e174-e184. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00749. EuroIntervention. 2024. PMID: 38343372 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical