Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Dec;8(4):287-91.
doi: 10.1016/s0924-977x(97)00086-2.

Caffeine place conditioning in rats: comparison with cocaine and ethanol

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Caffeine place conditioning in rats: comparison with cocaine and ethanol

N A Patkina et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1998 Dec.

Abstract

The present study employed the place conditioning technique to compare rewarding potential of caffeine with that of cocaine and ethanol. In Experiment 1 caffeine, cocaine and ethanol place conditioning were estimated independently, whereas in Experiments 2 and 3 the preference of the external cues associated with caffeine vs. cocaine and caffeine vs. ethanol was assessed in a single test. Caffeine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.) cocaine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) and ethanol (1.2 g/kg, i.g.) did produce secondary reinforcing effects comparable in magnitude (Experiment 1). In Experiments 2 and 3 animals had the opportunity 'to compare' rewarding effects of two drugs. Data showed that the preference of cocaine-paired cues was absolutely (100%) higher than those of caffeine, whereas reinforcing actions of caffeine and ethanol seemed to be equal. The proposed modification of conditioned place preference procedure may be useful for the comparison of rewarding values of different drugs with presumed addictive potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources