Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Feb;93(2):207-12.
doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00386-x.

Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome

Affiliations

Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome

A Y El-Bastawissi et al. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) and its management on subsequent pregnancy outcome.

Methods: We used a population-based retrospective cohort design that included record linkage between cancer data and birth records. The Cancer Surveillance System records of women with CIS (n = 1851, 312 diagnosed during pregnancy) diagnosed between 1984 and 1992, were linked to birth certificates of their first subsequent deliveries after CIS diagnosis. The comparison group (n = 9201) was a random sample of women without CIS who gave birth during the same years. The outcome measures were preterm and low birth weight infants subsequent to CIS diagnosis and treatment. Treatments included no therapy, dilation and curettage or endocervical curettage, cryosurgery or laser vaporization, and conization.

Results: Women with CIS who were not treated with conization had a small increased risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0, 2.0) and no increased risk of low birth weight infant (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7, 1.6), compared with women without CIS, after adjusting for maternal smoking, race, parity, marital status, and history of induced pregnancy termination. Women with CIS who had conization were more likely to deliver premature infants (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.0) than women without CIS, after adjusting for the same confounding factors. The apparently increased risk of low birth weight (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4, 2.4) seemed to be a reflection of premature delivery.

Conclusion: The risk of prematurity increased after conization for CIS and did not increase when women with CIS had other procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types