Noninvasive evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: prospective study using diagnostic algorithms to minimize nontherapeutic laparotomy

Abstract

A prospective study was performed to investigate the feasibility and benefit of evaluating blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) without diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) or other invasive methods. Diagnostic algorithms were designed by using ultrasonography (US) as a screening method. For unstable patients, a free fluid >/= 2 mm thickness on US images over any one of the intraperitoneal spaces (bilateral subphrenic, Morrison, and Douglas pouch) was used as an indicator for laparotomy. For stable patients, any intraabdominal free fluid detected by US was used as an indicator for further investigations. Computed tomography served as a principal complementary method. To further clarify the clinical results, the rate of nontherapeutic laparotomy (NTL) was compared with that from a previous 5-year review done before this study. During studying period of 1 year, 170 patients were consecutively enrolled. There was no delayed diagnosis, and 66 patients were found to have BAT; 17 patients were initial unstable, among whom 15 had free fluid shown by US and 13 patients had confirmed BAT. Eight of the unstable patients with free fluid on US were saved from NTL, of whom six had retroperitoneal hematoma. There was no NTL in unstable patients. Twenty-two patients underwent laparotomy. Two laparotomies done for a suspicion of bowel injury turned out to be NTL. The rate of NTL in the present study was significant lower than that in a previous review (9.1% vs. 32.2%, p = 0.025). Hence following well designed algorithms, noninvasive evaluation of BAT can proceed with safety, and NTL is minimized.