Experience with fifty repeat procedures for myocardial revascularization

Abstract

Fifty coronary reoperations were performed in 49 patients. The reasons for the operations were occluded or stenotic grafts in 23 patients, an inadequate first operation in 13, progression of coronary atherosclerosis in 3, and combinations of these reasons in 11. Mediastinal adhesions made the operations difficult and produced hazards. Six patients died from the operation. Seven surgical mishaps occurred, including damage to five functioning grafts from the previous operation and laceration of two ventricles. Nine patients had less than complete operations because angiographically demonstrated targets could not be found. Repeat angiography was performed on 9 of the surviving patients. Ten of the 14 new or revised grafts were found to be functioning. Although a repeat operation is more difficult technically and carries additional risks as compared with a first operation, the indications are thought to be the same for both first and secondary revascularization procedures. The increased risks of the repeat operations are compelling arguments to strive for complete revascularization at an initial operation in order to avoid the necessity of the second one.