Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Aug;31(8):724-9.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.8.724.

Evaluation of some methods for the laboratory examination of sputum

Evaluation of some methods for the laboratory examination of sputum

G M Tebbutt et al. J Clin Pathol. 1978 Aug.

Abstract

Methods for the quantitation of leucocytes, squamous epithelial cells, and potential pathogens in sputa are described. Microscopic examination showed that 58% of sputa tested (554/957) were purulent or moderately purulent and 48% were moderately or heavily contaminated by squamous epithelial cells. The presence of squamous epithelial cells indicated oropharyngeal contamination. A simple dilution technique was chosen to compare the isolation of potential pathogens from direct cultures and from dilutions of sputa (10(-7) per ml original sputum). The dilution technique permitted easier reading of sputum cultures and avoided the possible over-reporting of enterobacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which were frequently found on direct examination. Enterobacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were more likely to be isolated from sputa moderately or heavily contaminated with squamous epithelial cells. The use of counter-current immunoelectrophoresis (CIE) and co-agglutination tests to detect pneumococcal antigen in sputa is described. The presence of antigen in sputum was a more reliable index of lower respiratory tract infection than a positive culture. Co-agglutination tests were simpler to perform and used smaller amounts of expensive antiserum than CIE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339-44 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1957 Dec 28;273(7009):1306-9 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1975 Aug 25;233(8):894-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1975 Oct;28(10):801-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1977 May;30(5):417-20 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources